Case Study On Project for Financial and Strategic Analysis

Introduction

The following Business Analysis Project report represents the financial and strategic analysis through the selected company Activision Blizzard vs. Electronic Arts and Ubisoft as competitors. The report focuses on key financial and performance ratios while the business strategy has been analyzed through Porter’s five forces and PESTEL analysis (Khan, Alam and Alam 2015).

Purpose: The purpose of the report is to analyze and evaluate the performance of the company and its competitors through various key performance indicators. The analysis is conducted to examine the financial data to estimate the future risk and potential of the organization to achieve their objectives.

Company Background: Activision Blizzard is a largest communal gaming and amusement organization across the world (Activisionblizzard.com. 2016). While the competitor organization Electronic Arts is a gaming company involves in developing, publishing, marketing and distribution of video games. Ubisoft, another competitor is a developer and publisher of video games having its headquarters based in France.

Key issues: The financial and strategic analysis has been conduct to evaluate the key issues of chosen company, Activision Blizzard. The significant issues are decline in the sale of a unit product, “Call of Duty”, decline in the number of subscribers and average reviews on the unit game product “World of Warcraft” and “Destiny” respectively (Activisionblizzard.com. 2016).

Rationale of the selected companies: Activision Blizzard is a largest gaming company and facing critical issues that could hamper its cash flows. Other two competitive companies Electronic Arts and Ubisoft are equally popular for the product video games. Hence, analysis and evaluation of financial information and business strategy would be transparent and fair with respect to gaming industry.

Financial Analysis

Financial Analysis is a process of evaluating the feasibility, profitability and stability of the of the business performance. The analysis is performed through financial statements of the organization related to the accounting year (Carter et al. 2015).

Revenue analysis and forecast

Analysis of sales revenue is conducted to take decisions on business strategies and its performance for the related period. Revenue of Activision Blizzard shows increasing and decreasing trend since the financial year 2011 to 2015. The net revenue in the year 2011 stood at $4,755 while it increased in the year 2012 amounting to $4,856. H

Figure 1: Graph showing net margin

(Source: Created by author)

On considering the revenue data of all the three companies, it can be observed that the performance of Activision Blizzard was better as compared to that of its two competitors. Although, the revenue of Electronic Arts increased in the year 2015 but the same was declined in the year 2014.

Market share growth

Market share is a percentage of total sales of market industry and the total sales of a particular company over the financial period. Market share growth identifies the company’s share in the economic industry with respect to the profitability and growth (Dewachter et al. 2015). The approximate total sales of gaming industry in the year 2015 are $91.5 billion whereas the net sales of the company Activision Blizzard were $4,664 and Electronic Arts was $4,515. Hence, the companies procure a decent share in the gaming industry as well as have increased sales turnover in recent years.

Profit margins

Profit margin or return on sales is a profitability ratio that is used to measure the value of net income earned by the organization against its total sales. This ratio determines the percentage of revenue comprises the net income of the company. Additionally, it measures the ability to the company’s expenses to generate business income (Noori et al. 2016).

Table 1: Profit Margin Ratio

(Source: Created by Author)

As the profit margin of the company, Activision Blizzard is 0.19, which is lower than that of Electronic Arts that is 0.21 in the year 2015. However, profit margin ratio of another competitor Ubisoft is low at 0.12 than that of Activision Blizzard and Electronic Arts.

Price earnings ratios

Price earnings ratio is a ratio that is used to measure the company’s current price of shares and securities with respect to its earnings on each share (Jindal et al. 2016).

Table 2: Analysis of P/E Ratio

(Source: Created by Author)

The price-earnings ratio analysis for the company Activision Blizzard and its competitors shows that it is higher in case of Ubisoft while that of Electronic Arts is lowest. It measures that the investors of the organizations expects to invest to earn from the company as proportion to their shareholding (Feinberg and Park 2015).

Debt level (gearing ratio)

Debt ratio comprises of short-term and long- term debts that are borrowed by the companies to finance their assets. Additionally, gearing ratio is examined to measure the organizations’ debts to the equity. It indicates the risk of finance that the companies might face because high gearing ratio (Camarero, Carrion‐i‐Silvestre and Tamarit 2015).

Table 3: Gearing Ratio Analysis

(Source: Created by Author)

The analysis of debt equity gearing ratio shows that Ubisoft has the highest gearing ratio in the financial year 2015 while Electronic Arts has the lowest. In case of high gearing ratio, there is high proportion of debts and equity that indicates high financial leverage of the company. In the present situation, Activision Blizzard has the moderate proportion of debt and equity mix among the competitive organizations.

Cash and other ratio

Cash ratio is examined to measure the company’s ability to disburse off its current liabilities. High cash ratio indicates that the company is more liquid and has the ability to pay its debt from the liquid cash funds (Kriz, Wang and Issarachaiyos 2015).

Table 4: Cash Ratio Analysis

(Source: Created by Author)

The analysis of cash ratio reflects the position of companies in paying off their debts with cash and cash equivalent. Cash ratio of Activision Blizzard and Ubisoft is less than one; therefore the companies need to use other current assets to pay off current liabilities. On the other hand, cash ratio of the competitor company Electronic Arts is greater than one hence; it has sufficient cash balance to pay off their debts (Ogiela 2015).

Current ratio is used to examine the efficiency of companies to pay off the current liabilities with current assets.

Table 5: Current Ratio Analysis

(Source: Created by Author)

Since all the companies’ current ratio is greater than one, their liquidity position to pay off the debts is good and favorable. However, the current ratio of Electronic Arts is highest therefore the company has more resources to pay its debts (Feiz et al. 2015).

Key Performance Indicator

Table 6: Analysis of Key performance Indicator

(Source: Created by Author)

Growth percentage have been evaluated by considering sales of the year 2015 and 2014 which shows the increase in generation of revenue of all the companies (Podgórski 2015). Profitability percentage is highest in Electronic Arts while efficiency and solvency is moderate. This shows that all the three organizations are competitive and reflects the efficient performance in the year 2015 in all respects. Moreover, there is no research and development cost in Activision Blizzard and Electronic Arts whereas, Ubisoft had incurred in R&D expenses at 52.76% of sales.

Strategic Analysis

Strategic Analysis is a use of several tools to present the strategies of business by assessing the opportunities and threats of the organizations. Additionally, it involves a review of organizational strengths and weakness as well as environmental factors that influence the performance of the business (Amaldoss, Desai and Shin 2015).

Market and competitors analysis: It is the assessment of industry and organizational market considering the competitor organizations in the similar industry (Zhao et al. 2016). In order to evaluate the market and competitors analysis, Michael Porter’s five forces model and PESTEL tools have been considered.

Porter’s five forces is model that is used to examine the level of competition within the market industry and development of business strategy.

Figure 2: Porter’s five forces analysis

(Source: created by author)

Bargaining power of buyers’ exist when there are more number of substitutes available in the market (Chuchrova, Vilamova and Kozel 2016). In case of electronic games, the concerned company has competitors like Electronic Arts and Ubisoft, which are quite large distributors in the industry (Mathooko and Ogutu 2015). Therefore, the buyers’ bargaining power in the gaming sector is high.

On the other hand, suppliers’ bargaining power is also high because there are limited number of substitutes are available in the market. Besides, threat of new entrants in the gaming industry are low because currently there are large companies exist in the market (Fitzpatrick, Nguyen and Cayan 2015). However, it creates substitution effect and industry rivalry high because of the strong competitive organizations (Strumickas and Valanciene 2015).

As the gaming industry requires to be updated with respect to digitalization and innovation it is important to have upgraded software for the game products for their mobility. In the competitive world, companies have high mobility with updated software and innovative gaming programs.

PESTLE analysis is a comprehensive tool that examines the external factors to the organizations and its competitors in the gaming industry.

Table 7: PESTLE Analysis

(Source: Babatunde and Adebisi 2012)

Limitations of Financial models and conventional analysis

Financial models have certain disadvantages to analyze the organizations’ performance for the accounting year. One of the major limitations of the model is time- consuming. It requires ample of time to prepare each of the segments and variables of the model. Another essential limitation is accuracy because the model is presented by using various critical financial and accounting variables. Hence, there are chances to miss out some factors or make an error while presenting the data (Khan, Alam and Alam 2015).

The company faces some of the limitations in the gaming sector that are lack of class multiplicity. Even though the company launched new range of games, yet it did not match with the expectation of consumers. Another limitation of the company is technological advancement that is major factor of less revenue generation in the sale from the new game.

Along with the limitation in financial model, conventional analysis also has certain disadvantages. Since the analysis is conducted by Porter’s five forces and PESTLE it is difficult to examine each of the external factor to make the comparison with the internal factors. This may take place due to lack of availability of proper data, lack of preparation time as well as high cost of preparing the model (Strumickas and Valanciene 2015). The company’s major disadvantage is lack of using updated and advanced technology that affects the digitization of the games in terms of screen display, speed and software support.

Conclusion

The report has been presented by incorporating different variables of financial information and business strategies relating to the external and internal elements of the organization. The financial analysis reflects the growth in sales and profit generation for Activision Blizzard along with its competitors. Apart from that, company’s key performance indicators are also positive therefore, it has a scope to enhance its business and maximize the profitability in gaming industry. The company is required to focus on the programs and software for the products with respect to latest technologies so that it can overcome the substitution threats. If the company does not release new technologies, it might face the huge competition from rivals and loose sales revenue. Moreover, increase in sales revenue in the year 2015, company reflects future sustainable growth.

Recommendations

As per the data provided in the excel sheet for best case and worst-case scenario, current ratio and return on invested capital of Activision are lower. But, the same falls under 5%+ Trend in best case scenario. However in case of Electronic Arts, the return on capital and current ratio falls under present year’s best case. Hence, the company Activision Blizzard is advised to maintain its performance by increasing the current ratio and sales ratio. Attaining this step, the company will be able to maximize its profits and strengthen customer relationship. At present in case the company does not take step to improve its current and sales ratios, it will be difficult to survive in the gaming industry because of high market competition.

Recommendations using Modeling Data

Modeling data and forecast graphic shows the level of net margin percentage as well as return on assets considering best, moderate and worst case scenario for the years 2009 to 2016. On the basis of financial analysis net margin percentage and return on assets is the best in case of Electronic Arts as it has the highest percentage in comparison to other two organizations. Additionally, the net margin percentage and return on assets of Activision Blizzard are in increasing phase but at lower rates. As a result, the company has to face the rival company, Electronic Arts because profit margin, income ratio, gearing ratio and return on assets of Ubisoft are lower compared to other companies. Therefore, Activision Blizzard has to incorporate its assets and increase the sales of products to capture the market with a better profit margin.

Reference List:

Activisionblizzard.com. 2016. Activision | Blizzard. [online] Available at: https://www.activisionblizzard.com/ [Accessed 1 Aug. 2016].

Amaldoss, W., Desai, P.S. and Shin, W., 2015. Keyword search advertising and first-page bid estimates: A strategic analysis. Management Science,61(3), pp.507-519.

Babatunde, B.O. and Adebisi, A.O., 2012. Strategic environmental scanning and organization performance in a competitive business environment.Economic Insights-Trends & Challenges, 64(1), pp.24-34.

Camarero, M., Carrion‐i‐Silvestre, J.L. and Tamarit, C., 2015. The relationship between debt level and fiscal sustainability in organization for economic cooperation and development countries. Economic Inquiry, 53(1), pp.129-149.

Carter, R.B., Strader, T.J., Rozycki, J.J. and Root, T.H., 2015. Cost Structures of Information Technology Products and Digital Products and Services Firms: Implications for Financial Analysis. Journal of the Midwest Association for Information Systems (JMWAIS), 1(1), p.2.

Chuchrova, K., Vilamova, S. and Kozel, R., 2016. STRATEGIC ANALYSIS AS A TOOL FOR STRATEGIC DECISION-MAKING PROCESSES AT INDUSTRIAL COMPANIES. Aktual'ni Problemy Ekonomiky= Actual Problems in Economics, (176), p.180.

Dewachter, H., Iania, L., Lyrio, M. and de Sola Perea, M., 2015. A macro-financial analysis of the euro area sovereign bond market. Journal of Banking & Finance, 50, pp.308-325.

Electronic Arts Home Page. 2016. Electronic Arts Home Page. [online] Available at: https://www.ea.com/ [Accessed 1 Aug. 2016].

Feinberg, R.M. and Park, M., 2015. Deterrence effects of Korean antitrust enforcement on producer prices and profit margins. Journal of Competition Law and Economics, p.nhv028.

Feiz, R., Ammenberg, J., Baas, L., Eklund, M., Helgstrand, A. and Marshall, R., 2015. Improving the CO 2 performance of cement, part I: utilizing life-cycle assessment and key performance indicators to assess development within the cement industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 98, pp.272-281.

Fitzpatrick, B.D., Nguyen, Q.Q.A. and Cayan, Z., 2015. An Upgrade To Competitive Corporate Analysis: Creation Of A" Personal Finance Platform" To Strengthen Porter's Five Competitive Forces Model In Utilizing. Journal of Business & Economics Research (Online), 13(1), p.54.

Jindal, R.P., Sarangee, K.R., Echambadi, R. and Lee, S., 2016. Designed to Succeed: Dimensions of Product Design and Their Impact on Market Share.Journal of Marketing, pp.jm-15.

Khan, U.A., Alam, M.N. and Alam, S., 2015. A Critical Analysis of Internal and External Environment of Apple Inc. International Journal of Economics, Commerce and Management, 3(6), pp.955-961.

Kolios, A., Read, G. and Ioannou, A., 2016. Application of multi-criteria decision-making to risk prioritisation in tidal energy developments.International Journal of Sustainable Energy, 35(1), pp.59-74.

Kriz, K.A., Wang, Q. and Issarachaiyos, S., 2015. Debt Burden And Perceived Sovereign Default Risk: Evidence From Credit Default SWAPS. Public Finance and Management, 15(3), p.203.

Mathooko, F.M. and Ogutu, M., 2015. Porter’s five competitive forces framework and other factors that influence the choice of response strategies adopted by public universities in Kenya. International Journal of Educational Management, 29(3), pp.334-354.

Noori, M., Zhao, Y., Onat, N.C., Gardner, S. and Tatari, O., 2016. Light-duty electric vehicles to improve the integrity of the electricity grid through Vehicle-to-Grid technology: Analysis of regional net revenue and emissions savings. Applied Energy, 168, pp.146-158.

Ogiela, L., 2015. Intelligent techniques for secure financial management in cloud computing. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 14(6), pp.456-464.

Podgórski, D., 2015. Measuring operational performance of OSH management system–A demonstration of AHP-based selection of leading key performance indicators. Safety science, 73, pp.146-166.

Strumickas, M. and Valanciene, L., 2015. Research of management accounting changes in Lithuanian business organizations. Engineering Economics, 63(4).

Ubisoft.com. 2016. Ubisoft. [online] Available at: https://www.ubisoft.com [Accessed 1 Aug. 2016].

Zhao, Z.Y., Zuo, J., Wu, P.H., Yan, H. and Zillante, G., 2016. Competitiveness assessment of the biomass power generation industry in China: A five forces model study. Renewable Energy, 89, pp.144-153.