Act202 Management Accounting-The Segment Of Assessment Answers
To support your report you should undertake the following (and use the outcomes in your report):
1. Assign the costs to the activity centres using the resource driver consumption patterns shown in Schedules 1 and 2.
2. Calculate the cost of each activity performed in the relevant (to your allocated case) activity cost centre,using the information provided in item 1 above and in Schedule 3
3. A list of the activities performed and their annual costs is provided in Schedule 4 (some costs will need to be calculated as indicated in item 2 above). In addition the schedule provides an activity driver for each activity and the annual quantity of each activity driver. Calculate the cost per unit of activity driver for the activities listed. (Calculate to four decimal places.)
4. Based on the information calculated in item 3 above and in Schedules 5 and 6, prepare a bill of activities and determine the cost per unit for each of the two product items identified.
5. Would the difference in costs for the two products be reflected in the conventional costing system
6. Do you think that the existing costing system understates or overstates the cost of the two products identified in item 4 above Explain your answers in detail with reference to your calculations.
7. Consider and describe the changes in cost structure that are likely to have occurred at the Company over the last 15 to 20 years, and speculate on their causes.
8. Now complete your analysis and prepare your report. Your report should identify if there are any deficiencies inherent in the existing costing system and if so explain (using the outcomes from items 1 to
7 above) how activity-based costing could overcome these deficiencies. If, in your analysis, you determine there are no inherent deficiencies, explain (again using the outcomes from items 1 to 7 above) why not.
9. Include in your discussion, what factors the management accountant should consider when deciding whether to use an Activity-based system that includes both manufacturing overhead and non-manufacturing costs. And furthermore outline the benefits, costs and limitations of activity-based costing.
Answer:
In the particular assignment the analyst has taken up the business organsiation of Sasij business firm which works out in the segment of manufacturing the small range of goods. At the earlier point of time only three products were used to manufacture by the company. The firm used the tradition approach of recognising the overheads among the existing range of products.
Over the evolution of time the company started manufacturing the wide range of products. Still recognising the traditional approach of single recovery rate using the machine hour approach is not a feasible idea. the company should work out with the Activity based costing approach such that the individual overhead use both unit and non unit based cost drivers to assign cost to the cost object by primarily allocating the cost to the various activities and then according to the nature of utilisation of those activities the cost to be allocated to the products manufactured by the business firm
Traditional approach of costing
In the current context business firm of Sasij organsiation is working with the traditional approach using the single machine hour based recovery rate. Total cost incurred by the organisation towards the indirect expenses is $8,196,400. This cost as in the present approach is divided by the total machine hours utilised by the various business activities totalled to 9000 hours. This provides us a unit cost of $819.64 as a single recovery rate for the all range of products.
The approach of using the traditional recovery rate in the case of multiple ranges of products is a wrong practise and the company cannot determine the actual cost of the individual range of products. This might further affect the profitability of the complete concern (Innes, et. al., 2000).
Activity based costing
Activity based costing approach is a system based planning model utilised in the case where the business concern is dealing in variety of products and services and common overheads are utilised (Kapi?, 2014). These overheads are primarily classified on the basis of total activities and then transferred to the individual product costing on the basis on level of activities utilised by them (Turney, 1991). There are mainly two phase’s works out in the process of activity based costing.
Statement of cost pool
Cost category |
Cost |
Basis |
No. of activity |
Cost per activity |
Wages |
$5,952,000 |
Number of employees |
3 + 12 + 2 + 31 + 31 + 24 + 12 + 9 |
$48,000 |
Building costs |
$620,000 |
Floor space |
200 + 500 + 500 + 1000 + 1000 + 1000 + 500 + 300 |
$124 |
Depreciation |
$1,240,000 |
Machine hours |
0 + 0 + 0 + 4000 + 5000 + 1000 + 0 + 0 |
$124 |
Consumables |
$62,000 |
Orders placed by centre |
10 + 20 + 0 + 190 + 120 + 190 + 60 + 30 |
$100 |
Energy |
$260,400 |
Kilowatt hours used |
0 + 0 + 0 + 250000 + 370000 + 250000 + 0 + 0 |
$0.2993 |
Other |
$62,000 |
Number of employees |
3 + 12 + 2 + 31 + 31 + 24 + 12 + 9 |
$500 |
Total |
$8,196,400 |
Traditional approach of Machine hours |
0 + 0 + 0 + 4000 + 5000 + 1000 + 0 + 0 |
$819.64 |
Total cost of activities
Activities |
Total Cost Of Activities |
New Product Development |
$171,300 |
Sales and dispatch |
$646,000 |
Inspecting |
$159,000 |
Mincing |
$2,217,328 |
Mixing |
$2,370,245 |
Smoking and Packing |
$1,505,828 |
Administration |
$650,000 |
Corporate management |
$476,700 |
Activities and resource drivers used - Inspecting |
Wages cost |
Building cost | ||
Activity |
Percentage of labour time |
Percentage of floor space | ||
Inspect meat |
30% |
$1,785,600 |
50% |
$ 310,000.00 |
Disposal of substandard meat |
10% |
$595,200 |
10% |
$ 62,000.00 |
Move to mincing room |
10% |
$595,200 |
10% |
$ 62,000.00 |
Inspect finished products |
30% |
$1,785,600 |
10% |
$ 62,000.00 |
Disposal of substandard product |
10% |
$595,200 |
10% |
$ 62,000.00 |
Reports to Health Dept |
10% |
$595,200 |
10% |
$ 62,000.00 |
Total |
100% |
$5,952,000 |
100% |
$ 620,000.00 |
Activity |
Activity cost |
Activity driver |
Annual quantity of activity driver |
Allocated cost of activity |
Annual quantity of activity driver |
Allocated cost of activity |
Corporate management |
$476,700 |
Assigned directly to products |
$95,628 |
$95,628 |
$11,533 |
$11,533 |
Process receivables |
$260,000 |
No. of invoices |
600 |
$25,161.29 |
200 |
$8,387.10 |
Process payables |
$253,800 |
No. of purchase orders |
200 |
$16,374.19 |
100 |
$8,187.10 |
Production planning |
$136,200 |
No. of production schedules |
100 |
$10,983.87 |
60 |
$6,590.32 |
Reports to Health Dept |
$657,200 |
No. of production schedules |
100 |
$53,000.00 |
60 |
$31,800.00 |
Process sales order |
$400,000 |
No. of sales orders |
620 |
$50,000.00 |
190 |
$15,322.58 |
Dispatch sales order |
$246,000 |
No. of dispatches |
500 |
$39,677.42 |
100 |
$7,935.48 |
New Product Development |
$171,300 |
Assigned directly to new products lines |
$0 |
$0.00 |
$56,529 |
$56,529.00 |
Inspect meat |
$2,095,600 |
No. of batches |
100 |
$169,000.00 |
60 |
$101,400.00 |
Disposal of substandard meat |
$657,200 |
No. of batches |
100 |
$53,000.00 |
60 |
$31,800.00 |
Move to mincing room |
$657,200 |
No. of batches |
100 |
$53,000.00 |
60 |
$31,800.00 |
Set up mincer |
$156,550 |
No. of batches |
100 |
$12,625.00 |
60 |
$7,575.00 |
Load mincer |
$156,550 |
No. of batches |
100 |
$12,625.00 |
60 |
$7,575.00 |
Operate mincer |
$1,278,028 |
No. of kilograms |
49,750 |
$256,378.60 |
12,000 |
$61,840.06 |
Unload mincer |
$306,900 |
No. of batches |
100 |
$24,750.00 |
60 |
$14,850.00 |
Clean mincer |
$156,550 |
No. of batches |
100 |
$12,625.00 |
60 |
$7,575.00 |
Move to mixing room |
$162,750 |
No. of batches |
100 |
$13,125.00 |
60 |
$7,875.00 |
Set up scales |
$81,375 |
No. of batches |
100 |
$6,562.50 |
60 |
$3,937.50 |
Weigh ingredients |
$156,550 |
No. of batches |
100 |
$12,625.00 |
60 |
$7,575.00 |
Load mixers |
$313,100 |
No. of batches |
100 |
$25,250.00 |
60 |
$15,150.00 |
Operate mixers |
$1,568,895 |
No. of kilograms |
49,750 |
$314,727.93 |
12,000 |
$75,914.27 |
Clean mixers |
$162,750 |
No. of batches |
100 |
$13,125.00 |
60 |
$7,875.00 |
Move mixture to smokehouse |
$87,575 |
No. of kilograms |
49,750 |
$17,567.97 |
12,000 |
$4,237.50 |
Pack into skins |
$322,000 |
No. of products |
198,400 |
$64,400.00 |
24,800 |
$8,050.00 |
Setup smokehouse |
$122,600 |
No. of trays |
1,990 |
$12,297.08 |
500 |
$3,089.72 |
Move to smokehouse |
$64,400 |
No. of trays |
1,990 |
$6,459.48 |
500 |
$1,622.98 |
Smoke products |
$861,828 |
No. of trays |
1,990 |
$86,443.43 |
500 |
$21,719.46 |
Unload smokehouse |
$64,400 |
No. of trays |
1,990 |
$6,459.48 |
500 |
$1,622.98 |
Inspect finished products |
$1,847,600 |
No. of trays |
- |
500 |
$46,562.50 | |
Disposal of substandard product |
$657,200 |
No. of trays |
- |
500 |
$16,562.50 | |
Move to truck |
$70,600 |
No. of trays |
1,990 |
$7,453.26 |
480 |
$1,797.77 |
In the current approach of activity based costing overhead cost is primarily assigned to the cost activity and then to the respective product to be manufactured. Various factors are determined in the particular case that comprehends the analyst to determine the cost of a business activity.
Certain activities cost is not available which is evaluated using the previous table. On the later part cost of each activity is collected, these are also referred as cost pools (Pohlen, & La Londe, 1994). The approach of traditional costing works out with the fact when the company is manufacturing the limited number of products but with the growth and development of business concern the company should gradually move over to the activity based costing systems (Shields, 1995).
Conclusion
This assignment refers to the situation in which the business concern of Sasij which is dealing out in the wide range of product manufacturing process. Current approach of traditional overhead distribution is utilised by the business concern which placed a negative impact over the profitability of the concern. This is due to the fact of improper distribution of overhead cost. The analyst in the above assignment showcased the utilisation of activity based costing approach using the current financial data of the Sasij group taking the overheads of two products into account.
References
Innes, J., Mitchell, F., & Sinclair, D. (2000). Activity-based costing in the UK’s largest companies: a comparison of 1994 and 1999 survey results. Management accounting research, 11(3), 349-362.
Turney, P. B. (1991). Common cents: The ABC performance breakthrough: How to succeed with activity-based costing. Cost Technology.
Pohlen, T. L., & La Londe, B. J. (1994). Implementing activity-based costing (ABC) in logistics. Journal of Business Logistics, 15(2), 1.
Kapi?, J. (2014). ACTIVITY BASED COSTING-ABC. Business Consultant/Poslovni Konsultant, 6(32).
Shields, M. D. (1995). An empirical analysis of firms' implementation experiences with activity-based costing. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 7, 148.
Buy Act202 Management Accounting-The Segment Of Assessment Answers Online
Talk to our expert to get the help with Act202 Management Accounting-The Segment Of Assessment Answers to complete your assessment on time and boost your grades now
The main aim/motive of the management assignment help services is to get connect with a greater number of students, and effectively help, and support them in getting completing their assignments the students also get find this a wonderful opportunity where they could effectively learn more about their topics, as the experts also have the best team members with them in which all the members effectively support each other to get complete their diploma assignments. They complete the assessments of the students in an appropriate manner and deliver them back to the students before the due date of the assignment so that the students could timely submit this, and can score higher marks. The experts of the assignment help services at urgenthomework.com are so much skilled, capable, talented, and experienced in their field of programming homework help writing assignments, so, for this, they can effectively write the best economics assignment help services.