ACCT20074 Contemporary Accounting Theory- Social Contract

Answer

Preface

Generally, in order to effectively attain the key goals and purpose of the study, the second research questions related to the social contract and legitimacy theory is selected. Moreover, today, it is essential for all the types of companies to adopt ethical and legal rules to conduct the business functions effectively. Because these standards are improve organizational image and efficiency in a more dynamic manner. In addition to this, it is also important to know that, there are several internal and external factors that are forcing the companies to adopt ethical, legal and professional norms. Moreover, it is additionally vital to realize that, accounting is not just an imperative and profitable capacity of an organization but it is a dynamic and inventive business prepares that need moral, reasonable, legitimate, proficient, straightforward exercises. It is on account of the bookkeeping practices and procedure of an organization is specifically or by implication connected and connected with its key partners, for example, representatives, speculators, open, and clients.

Similarly, bookkeeping hones directly affect the key partners emphatically and adversely. For case, the moral and legitimate bookkeeping practices would rouse partners specifically. In this way, business firms ought to lead their bookkeeping hones morally, decently, lawfully and professionally keeping in mind the end goal to achieve long haul targets successfully. In addition the unmistakable and immaterial advantages of social contract hypothesis to the general public and business would be tended to viably. At long last, different execution strategies with respect to social contract hypothesis would be proposed with the end goal of improving the soundness and consistency of budgetary and bookkeeping announcing. Consequently, all these are the key goals or issues that would be address and settled amid the investigation of this exploration paper keeping in mind the end goal to accomplish the basic target of the review.

Applications, Principles and Concepts of Social Contract Theory In Accounting Setting

As indicated by H?ebí?ek, Soukopová, Štencl, and Trenz, (2011), Social contract hypothesis is described with different critical ramifications and also applications to legitimacy. Be that as it may, before understanding this, it is significant and vital to break down and comprehend the importance of social contract hypothesis and authenticity inside the bookkeeping. Essentially, social contract hypothesis can be characterized as an arrangement of tenets, models, laws, standards and standards that demonstrates connections among the general population and government and recommends how to associate with each other adequately. Individuals need to take after the social standards, laws and guidelines to live in the general public. Similarly, business firms are required to take after moral standards to contend in the market. Then again, in the support of Kumar, Reddy, and Ramaiah, (2014) found that, social contract hypothesis is a more powerful and profitable for now's difficulties business situations. It is likewise gotten to from the review led in the USA (McKinsey and Co 2012) that, every one of the sorts of business firms are assuming key part in the political, ecological and social difficulties and issues. Similarly, this hypothesis proposes the business firms to achieve their social and natural commitments to contend in the market. They ought to concentrate on fulfilling the requirements and needs of individuals of groups.

Michelon and Parbonetti, (2012) clarified that; this hypothesis is for the most part concentrate on considering the nearby groups in the business. According to this hypothesis, business firms ought to offer various adequate assets to their kin nearby groups for the social welfare. Additionally, it is likewise investigated that, a large portion of organizations are concentrating on gift for the general public benchmarks and some attention on utilizing benevolent battles to satisfy social targets. Every one of these practices and exercises of the business firms reflect centrality and uses of social contract hypothesis in the business world. Social contract hypothesis ought to be utilized by the organizations to accomplish long haul destinations and additionally ensure the enthusiasm of their key individuals by directing proficient, reasonable and moral bookkeeping hones. It is on account of the partners are the major and critical individuals of an organization that may influence the business choices, handle, development, destinations and accomplishment of an organi

Wagiciengo, and Belal, (2012) dissected that, this hypothesis is additionally accept a key part fulfilling the necessities of key individuals as well as making the connections, trusts, and confidence among the distinctive key partners, for example, representatives, clients, speculators, business accomplices, open and so forth. This hypothesis is likewise expresses that keeping in mind the end goal to grow long sensible connections and trust among the diverse level of partners, an organization ought to present reasonable information/data about the organization's bookkeeping rehearses, money related reports and records, exchanges and so forth. In addition, social hypothesis is commits and constrain the organizations or business firms to receive and take after moral and lawful practices inside the organization to lead the capacities (Yang, Su, and Fam, 2012).

Spence, and Rinaldi, (2014) clarified that, the key motivation behind this hypothesis is to keep away from untrustworthy and illicit practices taken after by the general population of the general public and business firms to win benefit. This hypothesis is additionally described with various huge moral, legitimate, and proficient principles and models that ought to be utilized and connected by the business firms or society. It is additionally concentrate on the common advances for both society and business. In the worldwide setting, this social hypothesis is more critical that attention on equivalent power. Similarly, this hypothesis shows that every one of the general population of the general public ought to be dealt with similarly and professionally. This is the fundamental segment of the social contract hypothesis (Khan, Muttakin, and Siddiqui, 2013). The following segment of this social hypothesis is identified with the regularizing uniqueness of the gatherings to the agreement. Regulating and additionally observational measurements are the two noteworthy measurements in the social hypothesis. For case, the main measurement is straightforwardly connected with the historical backdrop of starting points and the second one is reflects guidelines and standards. In addition, social contract hypothesis is examines essential inquiries under the regularizing measurements, for example, what are the key and crucial tenets, directions, benchmarks and rule that drive the general population to respond proficient and successfully with each other. The following inquiry is the thing that the significant circumstances are that can state really act (Salmanulfarisi, 2012).

In the expressions of García-Sánchez, Frías-Aceituno, and Rodríguez-Domínguez, (2013), this social hypothesis is additionally concentrates on tending to the privileges of individual in the general public. Be that as it may, in the business world, the social hypothesis is distinctive and one of a kind. For instance, the organization characterizes social contract hypothesis as an entirely speculative and also unwritten assertion. Besides, every one of the general population of the group ought to be concurred on the social shrink by assuming their parts in the general public. It is additionally imperative to realize that, with regards to business morals, there are different moral speculations, for example, partner hypothesis, social contract hypothesis and so on (Farook, Kabir Hassan, and Lanis, 2011).. For instance, the principle discoveries of the main moral hypothesis, for example, partner's hypothesis mirrors that a specific organization is not lawfully committed to the neighborhood individuals and group and an organization could make benefit for their key individuals by utilizing moral standards and laws. Be that as it may, business firms are ethically mindful to satisfy CSR capacities. Conversely, the finding of the social contract hypothesis holds that, business firms are completely committed to satisfy their corporate duties by contracting with the social orders, individuals and groups (Ebimobowei, 2011).

Applications and Roles of Legitimacy Theory in the Accounting

Fernando, and Lawrence, (2014) found that, the past research ponders demonstrates that, business firms or organizations have confronted a few moral, and lawful issues because of outrages and tricks that unfavorably influenced the notoriety, achievement and development of business firms in the market. As aftereffects of this, the essentialness of reasonable and moral bookkeeping rehearses had expanded in the corporate world. There is additionally fast increment in the legitimacy bookkeeping rehearses that is critical in beating different business difficulties and issues identified with bookkeeping embarrassments, misrepresentation, abuse of advantages, money related vulnerabilities. In the support of Dauda, Ombugadu, and Umbugadu, (2015) expressed that, Legitimacy hones helped the business firms to deal with, oversee and control such sorts of difficult issues in a compelling and legitimate way. Thus, it is basic, critical and significant for now's business firms embrace and utilize authenticity hypothesis, its applications, guidelines, gauges and standards in the bookkeeping setting to bring responsibility, adaptability, respectability and advancement with the present bookkeeping practices and strategy. Thusly, one might say that, this hypothesis is help an organization and its supervisors to manage an extensive variety of business issues by looking after reasonableness, straightforwardness and responsibility inside the business hones. In view of this hypothesis, one might say that, business firms are completely lawfully and morally mindful to concentrate on revealing of precise, right, and significant information and data about the money related position, explanations and records of the organizations without overlooking any imperative data to key partners (Dong, Burritt, and Qian, 2014).

Boulouta, and Pitelis, (2014) clarified that; All the data identified with organization ought to be revealed to build up the relations with the partner. Essentially, one might say that, this hypothesis has two noteworthy components, for example, straightforwardness and decency. Monetary reports and records ought to be created by an individual representative by concentrating on reasonableness and responsibility. It is on the grounds that there are various partners they utilize such data to take choices (Anbalagan, 2011). Likewise, authenticity hypothesis is additionally recommends the business firms to viably utilize moral guidelines and take after moral practices in the general public. This is likewise offers a great deal of critical moral tenets and principles that recommend organizations how to make benefit morally. Additionally, according to this hypothesis, an organization ought to likewise create moral gauges, implicit rules, proficient standards towards the general public to achieve long haul destinations. Similarly, this is more critical and profitable hypothesis that helps the organization in making a positive picture according to open and partners (Allan, Mcgregor, and Swales, 2011).

It is likewise investigated by Chen, Yasar, and Rejesus, (2008) that, this legitimacy hypothesis is additionally assumes a central part in the social bookkeeping and offer advantages to the client association. For case, the business operations and elements of today's organizations ought to be genuine with regards to groups. On the off chance that an organization don't take after and utilize honest to goodness hones, it might experience a few genuine difficulties and issues in the general public. On the premise of social bookkeeping hones, business firms are required to utilize different tenets and standards identified with natural, social and corporate detailing. It is on the grounds that it enhances confidence, connection and trusts among the inside and outer key partners. Generally, this hypothesis expresses that, in the present time, business firms ought to concentrate on satisfying monetary, social and natural duties by utilizing proper strategies and ways (Brown, etterlein, and Roemer-Mahler, 2010).

Collison, Dey, Hannah, and Stevenson, (2010) expressed that; the social contract hypothesis underpins the legitimacy hypothesis and concentrate on ecological announcing. It is additionally imperative for the organizations that they ought to bring development and change current business methodologies, practices and arrangements according to the appropriateness and CSR for the aggregate achievement and future development. They should likewise give all the data obviously in the front of groups and key individuals about the ecological effect. Consequently, one might say that, Legitimacy hypothesis is specifically related with the social bookkeeping hypothesis and both clarify and characterize social bookkeeping process. At last, it can be outlined that, business firms ought to embrace both Legitimacy and social contract hypothesis keeping in mind the end goal to achieve upper hands, defeat future difficulties and enhance hierarchical picture (Contrafatto, and Burns, J2013).

Relevance and Application of the Social Contract to Legitimacy Theory in Accounting

Burritt, and Schaltegger,(2010) researched that, in the corporate business condition, legitimacy is a fundamental and more profitable component for the aggregate achievement development of today's business firms. Essentially, Legitimacy reflects critical and significant esteems, standards, implicit rules and good esteems. Every one of these norms and standards are utilized and connected by the organizations so as to offer better results than the neighborhood groups and social orders. Similarly, the social contract hypothesis is additionally play a key and key part in advancing the centrality of overall public in the gauges and standards in the bookkeeping (Chiu, and Sharfman, 2011).. Then again, it is likewise imperative to realize that, legitimacy is more profitable and huge for the business firms in diminishing the dishonest business hones and in addition future doubts. The principle inspire of social hypothesis is to help business firms from the exploitative and illicit practices. For case, this hypothesis gives key headings to the business firms about how to keep up harmonization among the clients and clients in a powerful and legitimate way. The social contract hypothesis is additionally concentrate on the welfare of the neighborhood groups by applying and utilizing honest to goodness hones inside the bookkeeping setting (Akkemik, 2011).

In the words of Eccles, Ioannou, and Serafeim, (2014), the uses of the social contract hypothesis are specifically connected with the Legitimacy Theory. For example, the social hypothesis is commits to the bookkeeping individuals and specialists to exposure announcing decently and morally to the clients, for example, key partners. Also, providers, financial specialists, shareholders, clients, society, representatives and so forth are the key individuals and partners of an organization that need data for the diverse purposes (Gray, 2010). For instance, the nearby group utilizes bookkeeping data with a specific end goal to know and get to that a specific organization or firm is satisfying their social obligations by directing CSR capacities. The social contract hypothesis is likewise offers a great deal of substantial and elusive advantages to the business firms. For case, it gives vital headings to the senior administration about how to utilize and take after moral, lawful, and reasonable practices inside the bookkeeping setting by accomplishing manageability and additionally CSR works all the more successfully and inventively. Then again, the legitimacy hypothesis is likewise specifically help an organization and gives proposals to utilize gauges, standards, directions and guidelines to lead the business capacities all the more morally (Goswami, 2014).

It is additionally examined by Shen, Yu, and Khalifa, (2010) that, unwavering quality and legitimacy are the imperative components of the bookkeeping that are influenced by the social contract hypothesis. This speculation is likewise concentrate on fulfilling the requirements and needs of partners of an organization. Business firms ought to utilize social contract inside their honest to goodness hones keeping in mind the end goal to fulfill and upgrade the inspiration level of key partners. This is more powerful and exhaustive for an organization in achieving the center objectives and targets adequately. Along these lines, social contract hypothesis is expects a key part in creating balance among the general public and business adequately. Similarly, this hypothesis helps the organizations to accomplish upper hands and improve the level of piece of the overall industry and incomes in a successful and more unique way (Talha, Raja, and Seetharaman, 2010). Interestingly, if an organization does not concentrate on legitimacy rehearses; it couldn't get by in the aggressive market for the long day and age. Basically, one might say that, authenticity is a vital element that decides the achievement and development of business and aides in accomplishing long haul authoritative objectives viably. In this way, both social contract and legitimacy practices are related with each other and without these an organization couldn't be achievement in the market (Verburg, 2016).

As indicated by Zainuddin, and Sulaiman, (2015) in the present time, a large portion of business firms are concentrating on utilizing honest to goodness rehearses and satisfying CSR capacities. This demonstrates, without social contract or society couldn't get by in the market. Thus, it is basic for every one of the organizations that they ought to satisfy social obligations through authenticity rehearses. Then again, a social hypothesis is additionally makes a solid assertion among the representatives and individuals from society that is vital for both society and organization. Along these lines, the social contract shows and reflects social, moral and legitimate accountabilities of an organization. A social contract is described with various components including corporate generosity, CSR and corporate administration. These critical components of a social contract guarantee legitimacy of the money related and bookkeeping hones in an organization. Also, the hypothesis of legitimacy is absolutely concentrate on using and applying moral, reasonable and legitimate guidelines, code of behaviors, models, standards and standards inside the bookkeeping exchanges, detailing and practices. Both the speculations, for example, social contract and legitimacy is likewise considers and concentrate on the successful welfare of the business and society (Zeghal, and Mhedhbi, 2006).

Wallenburg, and Schäffler, (2014) expressed that, it is additionally imperative to realize that, social contract constrain the organization, its administration and workers to utilize honest to goodness hones in the bookkeeping setting by including all the social, lawful and moral parts of bookkeeping. For instance, an organization could be achievement in bringing development, straightforwardness and decency inside the bookkeeping rehearses by making social contract. This could likewise help an organization to defeat future and current business dangers, difficulties, and vulnerabilities with the business.

Social contract is likewise help the business firms in keeping up noteworthiness and responsibility towards the nearby groups by accomplishing the key business goals. Conversely, without keeping up respectability and responsibility, an organization may experience a few issues and dangers identified with out of line and false practices in bookkeeping setting. Social contract is likewise bound and powers today's organizations and business firms to concentrate on making and growing more maintainable announcing by considering diverse viewpoints, for example, budgetary, social, natural and so on (Schaltegger, and Burritt, R2010).

Pellegrino, and Lodhia, (2012) deciphered that; Social contract is likewise mirrors that the organization is utilizing most fitting and successful moral, legitimate, social standards to lead their bookkeeping rehearses. For case, social contract helps the business firms to create budgetary records and reports all the more fittingly, morally and lawfully by considering social discernments. Besides, social contract hypothesis is additionally manage the diverse angles, for example, decency, straightforwardness, responsibility, adaptability. Every one of these parts of the social contract mirror an organization's authenticity hones inside the bookkeeping setting. Social contract hypothesis is likewise bound and strengths the business firms to utilize authenticity hones in bookkeeping by considering the interests and desire of neighborhood group or society. This is the reason that, business firms are utilizing authenticity hypothesis or practices in directing of financial announcing. In the present time of globalization, it is required and essential for the business firms to take after sustainability principles and benchmarks in the reporting hones. Social contract proposes an organization that it ought to likewise work for the enthusiasm of financial specialists, government, and society by receiving of maintainability in revealing (Rossi, 2014).

Lacey, and Lamont, (2014) found that, in the present time various manageability methodologies, practices, strategies and methodologies are utilized by the business firms that demonstrate reasonable and straightforward business operations of the organization. These practices and strategy embraced by an organization assumes enter parts in advancing authenticity of monetary records of the organization. Generally speaking, one might say that, social contract to legitimacy practices is a device that make certainty and trusts among the diverse level of key partners.

In addition, both CSR and social contract are connected, connected and connected with each other and guarantees that authoritative announcing is reasonable and straightforward. Business firms are required to utilize and receive moral, social, and lawful standards, models and standards in creating of monetary reports, proclamations and bookkeeping exchanges. The applications and standards of the social contract hypothesis to authenticity hypothesis create relations among the business firms and society (Meslin, Carroll, Schwartz, and Kennedy, 2014).

Lanis, and Richardson, (2012) examined that; Business firms are more subject to settle on moral choices in directing authenticity detailing. Besides, moral and social standards recommend the organization to utilize compelling benchmarks and directions in setting up the budgetary reports and records. The social contract hypothesis is additionally manages the organizations and business firms that, they are in the market to satisfy the requirements of society. This demonstrates there is connection among the social contract among an organization and society for a particular reason. Subsequently, it is imperative for the business firms to concentrate on legitimizing business practices and operations by considering CSR engagement. In addition, social hypothesis is additionally mirrors the necessities, needs and desires of the neighborhood group or society towards how the organizations ought to play out their capacities and operations (Jacobs, 2012). Moreover, legitimacy hypothesis is proposes the organizations to utilize and take after social standards in directing business capacities and operations. This hypothesis is additionally gives key course to the business firms about how they can make and grow involved acquaintances with the key partners and society by satisfying their commitments in a compelling and appropriate way. Both social hypothesis and legitimacy hypothesis is bound the business firms to uncover their CSR parts of business. Thus, legitimacy hypothesis depends on the social contract hypothesis. In general, one might say that, both the hypotheses helps the business firms in achieving their center objectives, targets, capacities and mission and vision in a powerful and more creative way (Krieg, 2013).

Hayden, (2011) analyzed that, by utilizing these speculations, an organization could create more incomes and benefit by enhancing its picture and notoriety in the market. Similarly, both the hypotheses and their applications are more helpful in the corporate business condition for the aggregate achievement. At long last, one might say that, in the present time, it is vital, fundamental and important for the business firms to embrace such speculations keeping in mind the end goal to wind up noticeably more achievement in the aggressive business condition. It is on account of these hypotheses and their applications could help the business firms in accomplishing the upper hands or extension in the market in a successful and particular way (Hartz, Eand Nielsen, 2015).

Drawbacks of Social Contract Theory and its Applications

Gurnani, (2015) stated that, there are a few downsides or constraints of the social contract hypothesis. For instance, social hypothesis is makes clashes and issues in improving the authenticity inside the bookkeeping practices of an organization. Similarly, this hypothesis conceals authenticity practices of an organization straightforwardly or in a roundabout way. Then again, the other impediment of this hypothesis is that, this hypothesis bound the business firms to satisfy social duties at the different social levels. This social hypothesis is likewise concentrate on satisfying the necessities and needs key individuals; however the interests of the diverse partner could be distinctive with every other. This is a circumstance that makes perplexity and troubles for the organizations to embrace authenticity bookkeeping rehearses. Additionally, the level of money related detailing is another component that specifically influences the authenticity revealing. For instance, in the present business circumstance, each partner of the organization needs to gain more benefit at the lower costs. In any case, the cash spend on the social projects may influence the level of benefit of the key partner. In this way, there is a contention that CSR capacities ought to be satisfied or not. On the off chance that satisfied, how much cost was spent on this (Allan, Mcgregor, and Swales, K. (2011).

Alongside this, it is likewise examined by Collison, Dey, Hannah, and Stevenson, (2010) that, this social hypothesis is completely in light of the speculative world. In this way, it would not be simple for the organizations to utilize and apply this social contract hypothesis inside the bookkeeping setting or to direct bookkeeping capacities. Also, the tenets and norms of this social hypothesis is specifically or in a roundabout way constraining the business firms to take after different guidelines and standards in satisfying CSR capacities. Generally, these theoretical ideas of the social hypothesis couldn't be utilized as a part of the corporate world. Moreover, it is additionally essential to realize that, social hypothesis is likewise considers sensible tenets that couldn't be connected inside the bookkeeping hones effortlessly and successfully. Subsequently, in view of the above impediments and discoveries of the social contract hypothesis, it is broke down that, this hypothesis is not legitimate to explain authenticity of the accounting exercises executed by the business firms (Farook, Kabir Hassan, and Lanis, 2011).

Conclusion

In light of the discoveries, truths and examination, it is abridged and reasoned that, social contract hypothesis is comprises with various moral, and legitimate guidelines and gauges that aides business firms to successfully satisfy their social commitments in a viable and appropriate way. Besides, with the successful utilization of social contract hypothesis, an organization could create solid relations with the key partners and enhance its picture in the market. In this way, it assumes a noteworthy part in improving authoritative productivity and notoriety. Also, long haul vital targets can be accomplished by an organization in the event that it take after and utilize the gauges and standards of social contract hypothesis.

Alongside this, it is likewise broke down that, the primary concentrate on social contract hypothesis is on enhancing association income, piece of the pie, benefit, and efficiency by satisfying socially and naturally targets. In the meantime, it can likewise be inferred that, legitimacy hypothesis is additionally used to enhance and bring advancement inside the accounting setting since this hypothesis expresses that business firms ought to take after and apply moral and good practices inside their business with a specific end goal to survive and contend in all the more difficult and dynamic business condition.

By creating social get, a specific organization could pick up a considerable measure of unmistakable and elusive advantages from the market. Additionally, through the social get, an organization could likewise keep up the associations with the general population and could create benefits for the more extended time. Moreover, Social contract is likewise profitable and critical for the organizations to guarantee assurance, peace, strength and equity. Henceforth, it is more imperative to utilize and apply an extensive variety of authenticity tenets, gauges and standards inside the bookkeeping rehearses.

Alongside this, an organization ought to likewise receive moral and legitimate standards keeping in mind the end goal to create social contract with the nearby group. It would help the organization in bringing advancement, improvement and authenticity inside the present bookkeeping hones. By and large, it can be presumed that, diverse positive and negative contentions are made in the support and aversion of social contract hypothesis to authenticity. These show that, social contract hypothesis is more critical for the achievement of an organization.

References

Akkemik, K. A. (2011). Potential impacts of electricity price changes on price formation in the economy: a social accounting matrix price modeling analysis for Turkey. Energy Policy, 39(2),854-864.

Allan, G., Mcgregor, P., and Swales, K. (2011). The importance of revenue sharing for the local economic impacts of a renewable energy project: a social accounting matrix approach. Regional Studies, 45(9), pp. 1171-1186.

Anbalagan C. (2011). “Impact of International Business Ethics, Economic systems and Intellectual Property Rights in Business and Management.” International Journal of Marketing and Management Research, 2(1), pp, 2229-6883.

Boulouta, I., and Pitelis, C. N. (2014). Who needs CSR? The impact of corporate social responsibility on national competitiveness. Journal of Business Ethics, 119(3), pp. 349-364.

Brown, D. L., Vetterlein, A., and Roemer-Mahler, A. (2010). Theorizing transnational corporations as social actors: An analysis of corporate motivations. Business and Politics, 12(1),1-37.

Burritt, R. L., and Schaltegger, S. (2010). Sustainability accounting and reporting: fad or trend?. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 23(7), pp. 829-846.

Chen, Y, M., Yasar, T., and Rejesus, R. (2008). Factors influencing the incidence of bribery payouts by firms: A cross country analysis. Journal of Business Ethics, 7(7), pp, 231-244.

Chiu, S. C., & Sharfman, M. (2011). Legitimacy, visibility, and the antecedents of corporate social performance: An investigation of the instrumental perspective. Journal of Management, 37(6), pp. 1558-1585.

Collison, D., Dey, C., Hannah, G., and Stevenson, L. (2010). Anglo-American capitalism: the role and potential role of social accounting. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 23(8), pp. 956-981.

Contrafatto, M., and Burns, J. (2013). Social and environmental accounting, organizational change and management accounting: A processual view. Management Accounting Research, 24(4), pp. 349-365.

DAUDA, I.A., OMBUGADU, B.A., and Umbugadu, S. (2015). Threats and Challenges to Accounting Profession: A Draw Back to the Development of Accounting Practices in Nigeria. International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences, 5(4), pp. 96–104.

Dong, S., Burritt, R., and Qian, W. (2014). Salient stakeholders in corporate social responsibility reporting by Chinese mining and minerals companies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 84, pp. 59-69.

Ebimobowei, A. (2011). A study of social accounting disclosures in the annual reports of Nigerian companies. Asian Journal of Business Management, 3(3), pp. 145-151.

Eccles, R. G., Ioannou, I., and Serafeim, G. (2014). The impact of corporate sustainability on organizational processes and performance. Management Science, 60(11), pp. 2835-2857.

Farook, S., Kabir Hassan, M., and Lanis, R. (2011). Determinants of corporate social responsibility disclosure: The case of Islamic banks. Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research, 2(2), pp. 114-141.

Fernando, S., and Lawrence, S. (2014). A theoretical framework for CSR practices: integrating legitimacy theory, stakeholder theory and institutional theory. Journal of Theoretical Accounting Research, 10(1), pp. 149-178.

García-Sánchez, I. M., Frías-Aceituno, J. V., and Rodríguez-Domínguez, L. (2013).

Determinants of corporate social disclosure in Spanish local governments. Journal of Cleaner Production, 39, pp. 60-72.

Goswami, M. (2014). Corporate Environmental Accounting: the issue, its practices and challenges: A study on Indian corporate accounting practices. IOSR Journal of Business and Management (IOSR-JBM), 16(5), pp, 36-42.

Gray, R. (2010). A re-evaluation of social, environmental and sustainability accounting: an exploration of an emerging trans-disciplinary field?. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 1(1), pp. 11-32.

Gurnani, R.M. (2015). Globalization and ethical challenges. The Business & Management Review, 5(4), pp. 116-122.

Hartz, E., and Nielsen, C. F. (2015). From conditions of equality to demands of justice: equal freedom, motivation and justification in Hobbes, Rousseau and Rawls. Critical Review ofnInternational Social and Political Philosophy, 18(1), pp. 7-25.

Hayden, F. G. (2011). Integrating the social structure of Accumulation and social accounting matrix with the social fabric matrix. American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 70(5), pp. 1208-1233.

H?ebí?ek, J., Soukopová, J., Štencl, M., and Trenz, O. (2011). Integration of economic, environmental, social and corporate governance performance and reporting in enterprises. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, 59(7), pp. 157-177.

Jacobs, K. (2012). Making sense of social practice: theoretical pluralism in public sector accounting research. Financial Accountability & Management, 28(1), pp. 1-25.

Khan, A., Muttakin, M. B., and Siddiqui, J. (2013). Corporate governance and corporate social responsibility disclosures: Evidence from an emerging economy. Journal of business ethics, 114(2), pp. 207-223.

Krieg, A. (2013). Towards a normative explanation: understanding Western state reliance on contractors using Social Contract theory. Global Change, Peace & Security, 25(3), 339-355.

Kumar, K.S., Reddy, G.P., and Ramaiah, G. (2014). “The Importance of Business Ethics in Globalisation.” International Journal of Advancements in Research & Technology, 3(4), pp, 293 294.

Lacey, J., and Lamont, J. (2014). Using social contract to inform social licence to operate: an application in the Australian coal seam gas industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 84, pp. 831-839.

Lanis, R., and Richardson, G. (2012). Corporate social responsibility and tax aggressiveness: a test of legitimacy theory. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 26(1), pp. 75-100.

Meslin, E., Carroll, A., Schwartz, P. H., and Kennedy, S. S. (2014). Is the Social Contract Incompatible with the Social Safety Net? Revisiting a Key Philosophical Tradition. Journal of Civic Literacy, pp.1(1).

Michelon, G., and Parbonetti, A. (2012). The effect of corporate governance on sustainability disclosure. Journal of Management & Governance, 16(3), pp. 477-509.

Mook, L., and Quarter, J. (2010). Social accounting for social economy organizations.

In International Encyclopedia of Civil Society (pp. 1380-1384). Springer US.

Parmar, B. (2015). Ethical Issues in Accounting & Finance. Indian Journal of Research, 4(5), pp, 309-311.

Pellegrino, C., and Lodhia, S. (2012). Climate change accounting and the Australian mining industry: exploring the links between corporate disclosure and the generation of legitimacy. Journal of Cleaner Production, 36, pp. 68-82.

Rossi, E. (2014). Legitimacy, Democracy and Public Justification: Rawls’ Political Liberalism Versus Gaus’ Justificatory Liberalism. Res Publica, 20(1), pp. 9-25.

Salmanulfarisi, A. (2012). Accounting cycle and the development of Accounting Practices in Nigeria Arabian. Journal of Business and Management Review (Nigerian chapter), 1(1), pp, 36 45.

Schaltegger, S., and Burritt, R. L. (2010). Sustainability accounting for companies: Catchphrase or decision support for business leaders?. Journal of World Business, 45(4), pp. 375-384.

Shaapera, S. A. (2015). Evaluating the social contract theoretical ideas of Jean Jacques Rousseau: An analytical perspective on the state and relevance to contemporary society. AfricanJournal of Political Science and International Relations, 9(2), pp. 36-41.

Shen, K. N., Yu, A. Y., and Khalifa, M. (2010). Knowledge contribution in virtual communities:

accounting for multiple dimensions of social presence through social identity. Behaviour &MInformation Technology, 29(4), pp. 337-348.

Spence, L. J., and Rinaldi, L. (2014). Governmentality in accounting and accountability: A case study of embedding sustainability in a supply chain. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 39(6), pp. 433-452.

Talha, M., Raja, J., and Seetharaman, A. (2010). A new look at management accounting. Journal of Applied Business Research, 26(4), pp.83-87.

Verburg, R. (2016). Istvan Hont's Politics in commercial society: Jean-Jacques Rousseau and Adam Smith, eds. Béla Kapossy and Michael Sonenscher. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press, 2015, 138 pp. Erasmus Journal for Philosophy and Economics, 9(1), pp. 173-179.

Wagiciengo, M. M., and Belal, A. R. (2012). Intellectual capital disclosures by South African companies: A longitudinal investigation. Advances in Accounting, 28(1), pp. 111-119.

Wallenburg, C. M., and Schäffler, T. (2014). The interplay of relational governance and formal control in horizontal alliances: a social contract perspective. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 50(2), pp. 41-58.

Yang, Z., Su, C., and Fam, K. S. (2012). Dealing with institutional distances in international marketing channels: Governance strategies that engender legitimacy and efficiency. Journal of Marketing, 76(3), pp. 41-55.

Zainuddin, Z.N., and Sulaiman, S. (2015). Challenges Faced by Management Accountants in The 21st Century. Procedia Economics and Finance, (37), pp, 466 – 470

Zeghal, D., and Mhedhbi, K. (2006). An analysis of the factors affecting the adoption of international accounting standards by developing countries. The International Journal of Accounting, (41), pp. 373–386.