25503 Investment Analysis For Variance Assessment Answers
Questions:
(b) Report the simple annualised return of the tracker portfolio and the ASX200 index over the investment period.
Answers:
CBA |
WBC |
ANZ |
BHP |
NAB |
CSL |
TLS |
WES |
WOW |
MQG | |
Variance |
1.011 |
0.968 |
0.827 |
0.537 |
0.813 |
1.658 |
1.095 |
0.880 |
0.698 |
1.520 |
weight 1 |
0.67 |
0.02 |
0.11 |
0.35 |
0.13 |
-0.29 |
-0.05 |
0.09 |
0.21 |
-0.25 |
weighted variance |
0.681 |
0.022 |
0.093 |
0.187 |
0.103 |
-0.479 |
-0.051 |
0.081 |
0.146 |
-0.377 |
beta |
1.012 |
0.990 |
0.919 |
0.759 |
0.909 |
1.313 |
1.054 |
0.943 |
0.855 |
1.251 |
weighted beta |
0.681 |
0.023 |
0.104 |
0.264 |
0.115 |
-0.380 |
-0.049 |
0.086 |
0.179 |
-0.310 |
From the weights, it can be seen that all the stocks had a reduction in variance expect for CBA. On the other hand, none of the stock had an exposure that is exactly one but CBA, CSL, and TSL had an exposure that was close to the index.
The weights were derived from the variances covariance matrix using the solver add-in in excels. Arbitral weights were assigned to the stocks at first. The solver then minimized the variance, subject to the arbitral weights. However, it should be noted that the arbitral weights had to sum up to 1. The weighted variance was obtained by multiplying the derived weights to the variance. A similar approach was also used for the weighted beta values.
CBA |
WBC |
ANZ |
BHP |
NAB |
CSL |
TLS |
WES |
WOW |
MQG | |
weight 1 |
0.67 |
0.02 |
0.11 |
0.35 |
0.13 |
-0.29 |
-0.05 |
0.09 |
0.21 |
-0.25 |
Expected returns |
1.004 |
0.981 |
0.901 |
0.705 |
0.896 |
1.274 |
1.044 |
0.938 |
0.817 |
1.223 |
Weighted returns |
0.676 |
0.022 |
0.102 |
0.245 |
0.113 |
-0.368 |
-0.049 |
0.086 |
0.171 |
-0.303 |
Returns |
1.004 |
0.981 |
0.901 |
0.705 |
0.896 |
1.274 |
1.044 |
0.938 |
0.817 |
1.223 |
difference |
0.108 |
0.919 |
0.638 |
0.212 |
0.612 |
2.698 |
1.194 |
0.726 |
0.418 |
2.329 |
factor T |
0.004 |
0.037 |
0.026 |
0.008 |
0.024 |
0.108 |
0.048 |
0.029 |
0.017 |
0.093 |
RMSE |
0.066 |
0.192 |
0.160 |
0.092 |
0.157 |
0.329 |
0.218 |
0.170 |
0.129 |
0.305 |
To minimize the RMSE, the weights were multiplied with the weighted returns to get the weighted returns. The weighted returns were then minimized by the expected return to get the difference. The differences were then divided by 25 to get the factor T. to obtain the minimized the RMSE, the square root of the factor T were obtained.
Portfolio tracker 1 | ||||||||||
CBA |
WBC |
ANZ |
BHP |
NAB |
CSL |
TLS |
WES |
WOW |
MQG | |
Variance |
1.011 |
0.968 |
0.827 |
0.537 |
0.813 |
1.658 |
1.095 |
0.880 |
0.698 |
1.520 |
weight 1 |
0.67 |
0.02 |
0.11 |
0.35 |
0.13 |
-0.29 |
-0.05 |
0.09 |
0.21 |
-0.25 |
weighted variance |
0.46 |
0.00 |
0.01 |
0.06 |
0.01 |
0.14 |
0.00 |
0.01 |
0.03 |
0.09 |
Expected returns |
1.004 |
0.981 |
0.901 |
0.705 |
0.896 |
1.274 |
1.044 |
0.938 |
0.817 |
1.223 |
Weighted returns |
0.68 |
0.02 |
0.10 |
0.25 |
0.11 |
-0.37 |
-0.05 |
0.09 |
0.17 |
-0.30 |
beta |
1.01 |
0.99 |
0.92 |
0.76 |
0.91 |
1.31 |
1.05 |
0.94 |
0.86 |
1.25 |
covariance |
1.00 |
0.98 |
0.90 |
0.71 |
0.89 |
1.26 |
1.04 |
0.93 |
0.82 |
1.22 |
Correlation |
0.46 |
0.00 |
0.01 |
0.09 |
0.01 |
0.11 |
0.00 |
0.01 |
0.04 |
0.08 |
R^2 |
0.21 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.01 |
0.00 |
0.01 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.01 |
Portfolio tracker 2 | ||||||||||
CBA |
WBC |
ANZ |
BHP |
NAB |
CSL |
TLS |
WES |
WOW |
MQG | |
Weighted returns |
0.67 |
0.02 |
0.11 |
0.35 |
0.13 |
-0.29 |
-0.05 |
0.09 |
0.21 |
-0.25 |
Returns |
1.004 |
0.981 |
0.901 |
0.705 |
0.896 |
1.274 |
1.044 |
0.938 |
0.817 |
1.223 |
weight |
0.67 |
0.02 |
0.11 |
0.35 |
0.13 |
-0.29 |
-0.05 |
0.09 |
0.21 |
-0.25 |
Variance |
1.011 |
0.968 |
0.827 |
0.537 |
0.813 |
1.658 |
1.095 |
0.880 |
0.698 |
1.520 |
weighted variance |
0.69 |
0.02 |
0.08 |
0.10 |
0.08 |
-0.79 |
-0.06 |
0.07 |
0.10 |
-0.57 |
beta |
1.01 |
0.99 |
0.92 |
0.76 |
0.91 |
1.31 |
1.05 |
0.94 |
0.86 |
1.25 |
covariance |
1.00 |
1.08 |
1.05 |
1.01 |
1.02 |
1.04 |
1.02 |
1.00 |
1.10 |
1.07 |
correlation |
1.02 |
0.90 |
0.79 |
0.53 |
0.80 |
1.59 |
1.07 |
0.88 |
0.63 |
1.42 |
R^2 |
1.03 |
0.81 |
0.62 |
0.28 |
0.64 |
2.52 |
1.15 |
0.77 |
0.40 |
2.01 |
The table above shows the results of the expected returns, variance, beta and the r-squared of the two tracker portfolios. The most recommendable portfolio tracer is tracker 2 since it has a minimized R squared that is close to 100.
Buy 25503 Investment Analysis For Variance Assessment Answers Online
Talk to our expert to get the help with 25503 Investment Analysis For Variance Assessment Answers to complete your assessment on time and boost your grades now
The main aim/motive of the management assignment help services is to get connect with a greater number of students, and effectively help, and support them in getting completing their assignments the students also get find this a wonderful opportunity where they could effectively learn more about their topics, as the experts also have the best team members with them in which all the members effectively support each other to get complete their diploma assignments. They complete the assessments of the students in an appropriate manner and deliver them back to the students before the due date of the assignment so that the students could timely submit this, and can score higher marks. The experts of the assignment help services at urgenthomework.com are so much skilled, capable, talented, and experienced in their field of programming homework help writing assignments, so, for this, they can effectively write the best economics assignment help services.