NUR1201 The Patient Experience: Partnering in Care- Preventing Falls

Mr. Bill experienced a serious fall that caused him severe injuries which have impacted his life to date. He wrecked his right shoulder and injured his right elbow. In fact, the fall took off the skin under his right elbow. At the time of the fall, there was nobody around to help him get out of the gutter, therefore, had to struggle to get himself out. Once he got home, his wife and the visitors at home wanted to take him to the hospital. He, however, declined because he did not want to go to a public hospital because of his former experience at a comparable facility. He instead chose to contact his personal doctor who directed him on the next course of action. After the diagnosis, he again experienced another fall in the house after feeling dizzy. His GP diagnoses his situation and finds out he is anemic but the reason for being anemic could not be substantiated so he was put on a pill cam. This is a form of e-health medication whose aim is to monitor Bills internal organs and take photos that may be useful in identifying the source of the anemia. Other conditions that are also diagnosed include allergic rhinitis, hypertension, and type 2 diabetes.

In my opinion, care in public hospitals should be hastened to improve care outcomes. This may include the introduction of e-health technologies such as electronic health record, electronic medical records, and mobile health among others. Additionally, as we are told that Bill suffered another fall weeks after diagnosis, it could be important to introduce measures that may help in preventing falls. Technologies such as e-health could be fundamental in preventing long queues and long waiting hours experienced by patients before being attended to (Blaya, Fraser, & Holt, 2010). From the case scenario in our study, Mr. Bill refused to seek medication from a public hospital due to his previous experience at a facility of a similar dimension. It is important to note that if care at the public hospital was better and faster than it has been reported in this scenario, then he could not have opted out of going to seek medication and instead wait until next day to see his personal doctor. I imagine a situation where the injuries got worse leading to health deterioration. It could have been tragic. Such imaginations are some of the factors that have influenced my thoughts and feelings owing to the fact that he waited up to the following day instead of just going to a public hospital and receive urgent care. More patients would opt for seeking care from public hospitals if the quality of care was improved and patient-centered care made better (Epstein & Street, 2011).

It is clear from our scenario that a family is one among the foremost vital values anyone may possess. I am certain that my belief in quality care and the value of a family were a number of the factors that influenced my thoughts and feelings regarding what transpired. The origin of these two values is that sturdy family bonds that people share alongside the goodwill of taking care of other family members. Having a family around you when you are sick is extremely vital. This is true because the family is that the most immediate caregiver. Taking the example of Mr. Bill, his wife drove him to the doctor the following day and for many alternative weeks once he still couldn't use his arms. This is further proof that the family was crucial to the healing of Bill in the aftermath of his injury. Additionally, my belief in quality affordable care must have also impacted my feelings. This is because, from the scenario, we are told that there is some time in the past when Bill had to wait for eleven hours before receiving appropriate medical attention. Quality care is thus elementary in any care setting to guarantee positive care outcomes.

It is, however, important to state that the care provided in the presented case scenario had numerous inadequacies like long waiting hours before seeing a doctor. An example is when Bill had kidney stones and had to seek treatment from a public hospital. This, however, did not go as expected because he waited for eleven hours before receiving medical attention. The pain he was experiencing was too much and he had to take pills after every three to four hours to reduce the pain. I believe that this is just negligence from the hospital. No individual should be waiting for eleven hours to get medical attention no matter how busy the facility is. It is thus valid o point out that, nursing standards and Bill’s rights were violated by this hospital. I can, therefore, agree with Kusnanto that instant care delivery that follows nursing standards is that the best way to ensuring quality care and patient satisfaction.

It is also worth noting that other aspects of care as seen from the scenario were quite adequate. Mr. Bill in the case scenario says that he was satisfied with the services offered by his personal GP. This proves that the person-centered approach from Bill’s general practitioner was top notch. He was made a party to every health decision regarding his well-being. He additionally sheds some light on the physiotherapists he was sent to and he even claims that he is one of the best in business. From this scenario, we can ascertain that the quality of care from the personal GP was high and thus Bill was more satisfied with the health outcomes. According to Rathert, Wyrwich & Boren (2013), these types of care are quite important in improving patient outcomes.

I can confidently conclude that some public hospitals do not offer the best healthcare services. This could be due to the fact that they receive a large number of patients on a daily basis thus increasing the amount of work. This enormous number of clients in most cases causes overcrowding in the hospital and this negatively affects the quality of care. The following are some of the undesirable indicators of the above revelation. Firstly, the waiting hours before a patient is attended to are always look like in Bill’s case. These extended waiting hours may cause pain and agony to the patient and their families. Additionally, health deterioration may be experienced as a result of the extended waiting hours thus lowering the patient’s quality of life. These two indicators may, therefore, be fundamental in directing future changes in care. This can be done by prioritizing the interests of the patient. The private facility also had some health inadequacy in that it failed to address the issue of falling and prevent falls. This was evident when Bill had another fall weeks after treatment.

However, it is important to note that the care provided in private health facilities is one of the best in the country. They apply a patient-centered approach and quick service delivery. These are some of the positive indicators. Patients are normally incorporated in the decision-making process regarding their well-being using the patient-centered approach (Barry & Edgman-Levitan, 2012). For example, Bill was always involved in the decision-making involving his health unlike in his father’s case when the doctor made the decision to amputate his legs without properly involving him. According to Manary, Boulding, Staelin & Glickman (2013), private hospitals also respond to clients swiftly and thus improving the quality of care and health outcomes. The two positive indicators can be useful in directing future changes in healthcare.

Basing my reasons on the conclusions made above regarding the case scenario, I would initiate some action plans. One of the action plans would be aimed at dealing with overcrowding and negligence in the public hospital. One of the biggest problems faced by public health facilities is the high number of patients they receive daily. Most residents cannot afford the prices charged in private hospitals and will always opt for the public ones.  This can, however, be improved by increasing the capacity of public hospitals.  The families should additionally play a major role in care because they are the primary caregivers. It could also be necessary to introduce measures that would help in preventing falls and educating the patients on how to avoid accidents of similar kinds in the future. It is further believed that using e-health can be fundamental in improving the standards of care and patient satisfaction. According to Blaya et al. (2010), e-health technology helps in keeping the medical and health records of the patient in an electronic form. This makes access to patient information easier thus reducing the length of waiting hours and eliminating the problem of overcrowding.

Conclusion

Anyone wishing to properly understand patient experience has to practice patient engagement. In doing this, the caregivers get to come up with the best care plan for the client and also for future practice that may involve similar scenarios. This additionally helps nurses and doctors to know the improvements that should be made in different areas. Furthermore, if both the patient and their families can understand their roles in in care then the quality of care can be massively improved. It is thus obvious from the case that a patient-centered approach is the best way to provide quality care and improve health outcomes.

References

Ahmed, F., Burt, J., & Roland, M. (2014). Measuring patient experience: concepts and methods. The Patient-Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, 7(3), 235-241.

Barry, M. J., & Edgman-Levitan, S. (2012). Shared decision making—the pinnacle of patient-centered care. New England Journal of Medicine, 366(9), 780-781.

Blaya, J. A., Fraser, H. S., & Holt, B. (2010). E-health technologies show promise in developing countries. Health Affairs, 29(2), 244-251.

Epstein, R. M., & Street, R. L. (2011). The values and value of patient-centered care.

Kusnanto, H. Patient-Centered Care. Review of Primary Care Practice and Education (Kajian Praktik dan Pendidikan Layanan Primer), 1(2), 52-53.

Manary, M. P., Boulding, W., Staelin, R., & Glickman, S. W. (2013). The patient experience and health outcomes. New England Journal of Medicine, 368(3), 201-203.

Rathert, C., Wyrwich, M. D., & Boren, S. A. (2013). Patient-centered care and outcomes: a systematic review of the literature. Medical Care Research and Review, 70(4), 351-379.