Mng91211 | Leader | A Assessment Answers

The type of leadership within an organisation is domineering in determining the performance and motivation of workers. Different leadership models explain the relationship between employees and their managers and in the end, they influence the outcomes of an organisation defined by the productivity of the staff (Olaniyan & Hystad, 2016, pp. 164). Notably, authentic leadership (AL) attracts considerable support and attention among scholars over the past few decades. Wong & Laschinger (2013) say that (AL) is a strategy to govern through acquiring the legitimacy or approval from the followers that applies honest relationships between the leader and the subjects (949). Notably, (AL), positive psychological capital (PsyCap), and leader-member exchange (LMX) are related terms influencing the association between managers and the employees within an organisation. In a study conducted by Wang et al., 2014) AL positively relates to the LMX and the workers' performance and this improved productivity of employees become more significant among workers with high levels of PsyCap. The understanding of the dynamics involved between the three elements in organisational management is critical in helping managers among corporations learn how to improve employee productivity through active engagement with the workers. The building of the PsyCap among different employees depends on the execution of AL, which helps in enhancing LMX within an organisation.

The prominence of AL implies that it has a positive effect on the performance of followers. A study conducted by Olaniyan & Hystad (2016) concluded that authentic leaders act according to particular values and try to attain truthful and openness with their subjects (164). The most significant elements portrayed by authentic leaders are that they lead by example and exemplify high-level transparency while making decisions. Therefore, leadership by example epitomises the commitment of the leader and offers guidance to the follower on how to be psychologically and cognitively vigilant while working. Indeed, Brown & Treviño (2015) argue that the moral behaviour of an authentic leader is the foundation for follower direction because they are attractive and transparent making them more of role models than managers within an organization (592). Therefore, under AL, the construction of PsyCap is easy since employees are motivated by the leader to act rather than the direction or instruction trickling from them. Cheng et al. (2017) conducted a study among Chinese community and established that authentic leaders motivated their followers PsyCap through the mediation implication of the identification of the workers with the goals of the organization. Therefore, the leadership can bolster PsyCap among different level of employees running from white collar, casual labourers, blue collar, administrative, and professional regardless of the age of the workers.

There is considerable evidence on the implications of AL on their followers PsyCap in the areas of human resource management and manufacturing organisations. In a study conducted by Baron, Franklin & Hmieleski,. (2016), the success of an organisation and its ability to realise its objectives depend on the physical and psychological participation of human resources. Therefore, effective leadership is significant in bolstering a firm’s competitive advantage through increasing employee’s motivation that augments their PsyCap. Indeed, positive business scholarship offers a structure for comprehending the implications of human behaviour on corporate strategy and elucidates the importance of LMX and workers competencies. In another study conducted by Liu et al. (2013), PsyCap appeared as the quest to determine what is right for workers living with HIV and the means through employers can develop and manage the human resources effectively. Thus, LMX structures and paradigms play a significant role in influencing how employees engage and bolster their PsyCap to become productive and align themselves with the objectives and aspiration of the organisations where they work. Therefore, LMX attained through AL can help reduce depression and anxiety among workers working on a fulltime basis increasing the PsyCap.

Employees PsyCap is essential for all workers regardless of the ranks and nature of organisations they work. Paek et al. (2015) conducted a research in South Korean five-star hotels and the methods to improve PsyCap for the staff. The results showed that LMX mediated the effect of PsyCap on job satisfaction and employee commitment to their work. Therefore, the leaders of the five-star hotels could apply AL to augment manager and employee’s relationship that would eventually lead to improved PsyCap. Indeed, workers are the most significant resources in an organization, and the active association with their leaders dictates the heights to which the business can rise (Paek et al., 2015). Peng et al. (2013) assessed the impact of PsyCap on job turnover among nurses in China. The study also pursued to establish how the Chinese government could improve nurses PsyCap through the commitment to the needs of the health workers. The results certified that lack of government commitment to the needs of nurses was a significant reason the led to turnover intentions among nurses (Peng et al., 2013). Inadequate resources and poor management of hospitals appeared to be some of the critical elements that reduced nurse’s motivation. Therefore, the education of nurse leaders on how to embrace modern methods of leadership such as transformative and authentic leadership was one of the recommendations to help solve the situation. Nurses would have a platform under effective leadership to raise their concerns and motivation for the job well done would bolster their work morale. 

There is a different perception of PsyCap among managers and employees among organisations. Therefore, delving into the understanding of employees towards their leader’s PsyCap and the implications it has on LMX and PsyCap of the workers is significant in understanding how to help organisations bolster staff PsyCap. In a study conducted by Hongyi (2017) among managers and employees employees PsyCap depended on the AL style adopted by the managers that influenced the way they perceive the leaders and willingness to engage them in case of any concern within the organisation (26). Therefore, managers could improve their follower engagement in the matters of organisational performance through authentic leaders that would augment their PsyCap. In the words of Bouckenooghe, Zafar & Raja. (2015), psychological capital is both an employee and leader essential because they require understanding each other positions for them to nurture an environment of interaction. The perceived LMX is a product of trust and confidence in the structures of an organization, and the failure of the institution of these significant elements is tantamount to failed communication networks among leaders and followers. Consequently, the practical achievement of employee PsyCap within a corporation is an element of the leadership structure adopted by the organisation.

PsyCap comes from positive psychology and optimistic institutional behaviour. Notably, organisational derives from the cultural components enshrined in the structure and models frameworks for objectives and goals attainment. Luthans & Youssef-Morgen (2017) researched the elements of PsyCap and organisational commitments applicable in ensuring that their employees cherish maximum PsyCap. The authors recognise that Psycap is a prominent element in relationships, education, work, and life in general (340). Unfortunately, much focus in psychology lays in the field of mental illnesses neglecting the significant contribution it provides in organisational management. Modern studies in psychology have diversified their areas of research to cover other elements such as leadership, management, productivity, and motivation (Roche, Haar, & Luthans, 2014). Therefore, the type of organisational behaviour may cultivate or hamper the sense of ownership and safety among their employees while working in an organisation. The use of motivation for the realisation of organisation performance is a famous concept in the current business environment. The idea embedded in stimulation and response to different types of stimuli is real in the interaction of leader and followers in the corporate context. Indeed, the guarantee of safety and useful communication tools within an organization gives workers a sense of belonging and they identify with the operations of the firm. In the words of Malik (2013), the application of positively oriented human resources psychological and strengths are manageable and effectively developed for employees’ performance improvement (3). Thus, the effectiveness of business culture and leadership style has the potential to improve employee’s engagement and the PsyCap making them more productive.

While researching Chinese logistics companies in the city of Beijing, Wang et al., (2014) found the challenges facing organisational leaders while trying to augment their followers PsyCap. According to the findings, leaders sometimes focus more on external factors influencing the productivity of firms neglecting the human resources available in the internal environment (18). Therefore, the overemphasise on factors such as competition winning market share often repatriates the focus of the business away from employees needs and concerns. Clarke (2013) says that the absence of focus on employees needs and interests make the redundant affecting the performance of the business (25). It would be absurd for leaders to forget that the most significant element in the pursuit of business excellence is the workers who dictate the quality of services and products in the organisation. Consequently, it becomes critical for an organisation to enter the competitive world through the effective utilisation of the available resources before diverting their attention to the externalities (Bilbao-Osorio et al., 2013). Precisely, the AL style ensures that employees always cherish the attention of the leader. Employees feeling appreciated for what they do require minimum supervision because their willingness to work remains at a maximum level all the time.

The idea of emotional intelligence and job satisfaction among employees is critical in the contemporary environment of work. In a research conducted by Ngirande & Timothy (2014), among South African electric power industry, the emotional intelligence of the managers in the sectors appeared to have a significant impact on the motivation and performance of workers (Ngirande & Timothy, 2014, pp. 36). The emotional intelligence among different stakeholders within an organisation is the tool that propels understanding and peace among them (Fierro, 2016, pp. 34). Employees and leaders with higher levels of emotional intelligence operate within the limits of motivation essential for job satisfaction. Notably, stakeholders within an organisation do not work in isolation and one instance or another; they require making communication for the furtherance of the institution goals (Leavy, 2013). Therefore, the negative emotions among human resources in a business are tantamount to failed operations in an organisation. Emotional intelligence leads to increased job satisfaction, PsyCap among leader and workers, teamwork, and organisational success. Therefore, researchers have delved into the reasons that make poor emotions in business society affect the success of a business.

Organizational and individuals productivity depends on the relationships between the stakeholders. Therefore, one could contemplate the situation where individuals are isolated and do not speak to one another because of some emotional issues among them. Indeed, when all parties are in tandem emotionally, they are bound to make effective consultations geared towards the attainment of the overall goals of the organisation (Leavy, 2013). Notably, the willingness of employees to contribute to the growth of the firm depends on their emotional state. According to Gooty et al. (2013), emotionally deprived individuals will express withdrawal symptoms towards the responsibility they are given to perform. Therefore, emotional nourishment among employees and their managers is imperative in guaranteeing both the spiritual and physiological commitment. For instance, a job environment that involves quarrels and disagreements may be inimical to the required cooperation among the workers and the senior management. Often, the leaders will be raising personal issues directed towards workers they dislike making it for them to work as required of them. Emotional attachments are private, and they do not contribute to the productivity of the organisation (Kaplan et al., 2014). Passionate leaders lead an enormous deterioration of the of the worker's motivation because they feel disliked by the manager or the leader. 

Another aspect associated with emotions in the working place is the impacts on the teamwork among workers at different levels of the institution. In the words of Kaplan et al. (2014), the attainment of the projected objectives of a business requires the collaboration of workers and departments. Little, Gooty & Williams, (2016) reiterates the same by arguing that stakeholders in an organisation need to work together as a team because the various segments work differently for the realisation of a common goal. In light of research conducted by Arghode (2013), multiple departments in an institution are answerable and report to a common end, and in case there are disconnections among workers in the various departments, it will be difficult to keep track of the miles the business has gone (72). Firms require frequent consultation to determine the extent of the realisation of their goals making teamwork an essential element in the fulfilment of the intended ends. Therefore, in a situation where a leader in a department has personal issues with another leader in a different department, there will be less consultation making it difficult to compare the progress between the two wings in the business. Unfortunately, when employees engage in emotional wars, they may become jealous of their colleagues to the extent of trying to set them up to their seniors (Humphrey, Ashforth & Diefendorff, 2015). Significantly, emotional fallout among people within an organisation sets a lousy precedent for prospective workers who may not want to face what they here concerning an organisation.

Undoubtedly, organisations face various forms of emotional lapse. Unfortunately, most of these setbacks come from personal connections between the parties involved. Therefore, they are dangerous to the success of the business because they occasion fragmentation among the workers (Humphrey, Ashforth & Diefendorff, 2015). Thus, organisations must draw the lines of interaction to ensure that there are no instances of emotional fallout among their workers. It would be critical for businesses to spell out the interaction rules among employees at different levels to avoid commotions that may lead to unnecessary hatred among themselves. Those employees taking things personal against others should receive sanctions to ensure collaborated efforts for the realisation of institutional performance. Moreover, the organisation may have policies stipulating the extent into which employees need to engage each other while working to avoid some of them bring outside issues into the working environment (Little, Gooty, & Williams, 2016). Significantly, it is essential for the management to ensure that they forester a platform where employees can raise they displeasure without the knowledge of the involved persons. Consequently, all people within the firm will have the privilege to do their duties as expected of them without fearing their relationships with others.

AL, LMX, and PsyCap are essential elements within an organisation. Often, good leadership engendered through authentic leaders nurtures an environment where workers feel free to interact and associate with their leaders improving their PsyCap. Authentic leaders ensure that they identify with the needs of their followers and act as facilitators of success. Therefore, they avoid confrontation and commands and make workers feel appreciated for what they do and motivated to contribute effectively to the productivity of the organisation. The relationship between an authentic leader and the employees facilitates understanding between them despite their age, professional level, and the degree of supervision involved. Workers under authentic leaders will always perform their duties even without supervision. Related to PsyCap is emotional intelligence that is a significant influence of the productivity of the employees. Notably, stakeholders within an institution require exemplifying high levels of professionalism for them to avoid emotional fallouts with their colleagues because it deteriorates the attainment of business goals and objectives. Therefore, an authentic leader is useful in helping an organisation cultivate emotional intelligence among workers and their leaders improving Psycap among them.

Reference List

Arghode, V. (2013). Emotional and social intelligence competence: Implications for instruction. International Journal of Pedagogies and Learning, 8(2), pp. 66-77.

Baron, R.A., Franklin, R.J. & Hmieleski, K.M. (2016). Why entrepreneurs often experience low, not high, levels of stress: The joint effects of selection and psychological capital. Journal of management, 42(3), pp. 742-768.

Bilbao-Osorio, B., Blanke, J., Campanella, E., Crotti, R., Drzeniek-Hanouz, M. & Serin, C. (2013). Assessing the sustainable competitiveness of nations in World Economic Forum The Global Competitiveness Report, pp. 53-82.

Bouckenooghe, D., Zafar, A. & Raja, U. (2015). How ethical leadership shapes employees’ job performance: The mediating roles of goal congruence and psychological capital. Journal of Business Ethics, 129(2), pp. 251-264.

Brown, M.E. & Treviño, L.K., 2014. Do role models matter? An investigation of role modeling as an antecedent of perceived ethical leadership. Journal of Business Ethics, 122(4), pp. 587-598.

Chen, Q., Wen, Z., Kong, Y., Niu, J. & Hau, K.T. (2017). Influence of Leaders' Psychological Capital on Their Followers: Multilevel Mediation Effect of Organizational Identification. Frontiers in psychology, 8, pp. 1776.

Clarke, S. (2013). Safety leadership: A meta?analytic review of transformational and transactional leadership styles as antecedents of safety behaviours. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 86(1), pp. 22-49.

Fierro, R.S. (2016). Enhancing facilitation skills: Dancing with dynamic tensions. New Directions for Evaluation, 16(149), pp. 31-42.

Gooty, J., Gavin, M.B., Ashkanasy, N.M. & Thomas, J.S. (2014). The wisdom of letting go and performance: The moderating role of emotional intelligence and discrete emotions. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 87(2), pp. 392-413.

Hongyi, C. (2017). Leaders’ psychological capital and authentic leadership as predictors of employees’ perceptions of fairness (Doctoral dissertation).

Humphrey, R.H., Ashforth, B.E. & Diefendorff, J.M. (2015). The bright side of emotional labor. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 36(6), pp. 749-769.

Kaplan, S., Cortina, J., Ruark, G., LaPort, K. & Nicolaides, V. (2014). The role of organizational leaders in employee emotion management: A theoretical model. The Leadership Quarterly, 25(3), pp. 563-580.

Leavy, B. (2013). Effectiveness at the top–what makes the difference and why?. Strategy & Leadership, 41(3), pp. 11-19.

Little, L.M., Gooty, J. & Williams, M. (2016). The role of leader emotion management in leader–member exchange and follower outcomes. The Leadership Quarterly, 27(1), pp. 85-97.

Liu, L., Pang, R., Sun, W., Wu, M., Qu, P., Lu, C. & Wang, L. (2013). Functional social support, psychological capital, and depressive and anxiety symptoms among people living with HIV/AIDS employed full-time. BMC psychiatry, 13(1), pp. 324-350.

Luthans, F. & Youssef-Morgan, C.M. (2017). Psychological capital: An evidence-based positive approach. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 4, pp. 339-366.

Malik, A. (2013). Efficacy, hope, optimism and resilience at workplace–Positive organizational behavior. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, 3(10), pp. 1-4.

Ngirande, H. & Timothy, H.T. (2014). The relationship between leader emotional intelligence and employee job satisfaction. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 5(6), pp. 35-40.

Olaniyan, O.S. & Hystad, S.W. (2016). Employees’ psychological capital, job satisfaction, insecurity, and intentions to quit: The direct and indirect effects of authentic leadership. Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 32(3), pp. 163-171.

Paek, S., Schuckert, M., Kim, T.T. & Lee, G. (2015). Why is hospitality employees’ psychological capital important? The effects of psychological capital on work engagement and employee morale. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 50, pp. 9-26.

Peng, J., Jiang, X., Zhang, J., Xiao, R., Song, Y., Feng, X., Zhang, Y. and Miao, D. (2013). The impact of psychological capital on job burnout of Chinese nurses: the mediator role of organizational commitment. PloS one, 8(12), pp. 1-5.

Roche, M., Haar, J.M. & Luthans, F. (2014). The role of mindfulness and psychological capital on the well-being of leaders. Journal of occupational health psychology, 19(4), pp. 476.

Wang, H., Sui, Y., Luthans, F., Wang, D. & Wu, Y. (2014). Impact of authentic leadership on performance: Role of followers' positive psychological capital and relational processes. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 35(1), pp. 5-21.

Wong, C.A. & Laschinger, H.K. (2013). Authentic leadership, performance, and job satisfaction: the mediating role of empowerment. Journal of advanced nursing, 69(4), pp. 947-959.