MNG00785 Project Management-Quality Management Plan
Answer:
The analysis of the various areas of influence for the project of “Development of the Ticketing System for RALS” has shown a critical review of strategy, financial, social, operational, and customers. These factors have crucial impact on the operations of the project. The following table would depict the impact of these factors,
Rank |
Area of impact |
Description |
1st |
Financial |
The part of money related territory is exceptionally critical for the improvement of the project and its suggestion for the administration of the capacities. The examination would demonstrate the arrangement of the metaphorical improvement of the funds and their suggestion for the advancement of the last angles. |
2nd |
Customer |
The clients assume an essential part in adjusting the advancement of the viable and enhanced procedures. The client territory is a measure of the impact of the clients on the operations of the project. It would shape the possibility of building up the operations of the association. |
3rd |
Operational |
The operations of the task would have a tendency to infer the arrangement of the adequate organization of the project and its capacities. The RALS project would need to guarantee that the operations of the task would have a tendency to suggest the brilliant organization of operations. |
4th |
Strategy |
Business associations have been utilizing the business operation advancement by the assistance of keen and compelling procedure improvement. The techn ique territory would shape the combination of the steady administration of the operations for framing the investigation of the project. |
5th |
Social |
Project associations have been utilizing the development of the social upliftment and administration for guaranteeing the help of the legislature and neighbourhood group. The social zone helps in framing the administration of the operations for building up the authoritative procedure. |
o Better – Ticketing system created in the undertaking would help in conquering the administration of the operations for RALS and Globex. The change of the operations would help in basic assessment of the operations and capacities.
o Faster – Ticketing system created in the undertaking would help in enhancing the productivity of operations by basic assessment of the project mix and administration. The expanded pace of operations would help in conclusive administration of the operations.
o Cheaper – Ticketing system created in the project would help in shaping the simplicity of operations which would automatically diminish the general cost of the capacities of the administrations of RALS and Globex.
o Do more – Ticketing system created in the project would help in expanding the usefulness and part of building up the task operation.
Part Two: Define Scope and produce a Scope Management Plan
Scope Definition: The project “Development of the Ticketing System for RALS” is developed for integrating the use of the information and formation of the improved ticketing system for the development of the operations. The project would involve the improvement of the operations of Globex for the RALS or Riverina Agricultural and Lifestyle Show.
Requirements:
The human requirements of the project of “Development of the Ticketing System for RALS” are Project Manager, Investment Manager, Project Sponsor, System Analyst, System Developer, Risk Analyser, Business Analyst, and System Tester.
The material requirements of the project of “Development of the Ticketing System for RALS” are computer devices, storage media, network components, raw materials, routers for network connection, and infrastructure.
In-scope and out of scope items of the project: The project plan, budget allocation, system design, implementation plan, and change management schemes are the inclusion and in scope items of the project. The development plan would be helpful for considering the involvement of the project integration and its significant management of the plan of operations. However, the transportation and communication plan are not a part of the project plan.
List of resources:
The resources used in the project of “Development of the Ticketing System for RALS” are given in the tables below
The usage of the resources are given in the table below,
Resource Name |
Work |
Cost |
Project Manager |
768 hrs |
$153,600.00 |
Requirement Analysis |
24 hrs |
$4,800.00 |
Specification of Project is Evaluated |
32 hrs |
$6,400.00 |
Project Kick off meeting |
32 hrs |
$6,400.00 |
Analysis of various vendors |
32 hrs |
$6,400.00 |
Capability analysis of vendors |
40 hrs |
$8,000.00 |
Budget Planning |
40 hrs |
$8,000.00 |
Planning Schedule |
32 hrs |
$6,400.00 |
Labor Management is planned |
32 hrs |
$6,400.00 |
System Design is made |
40 hrs |
$8,000.00 |
Milestone Requirements are formed |
56 hrs |
$11,200.00 |
Implementing system designed |
80 hrs |
$16,000.00 |
Requirement of design implemented |
72 hrs |
$14,400.00 |
Risk Assessment |
56 hrs |
$11,200.00 |
Risk Mitigation |
48 hrs |
$9,600.00 |
Development of risk register |
56 hrs |
$11,200.00 |
Risk Impact is modified |
64 hrs |
$12,800.00 |
Success Evaluation of project |
16 hrs |
$3,200.00 |
Final Project report is developed |
16 hrs |
$3,200.00 |
Investment Manager |
40 hrs |
$4,000.00 |
Budget Planning |
40 hrs |
$4,000.00 |
Project Sponsor |
152 hrs |
$18,240.00 |
Project Kick off meeting |
32 hrs |
$3,840.00 |
Budget Planning |
40 hrs |
$4,800.00 |
Initiation is built |
48 hrs |
$5,760.00 |
Success Evaluation of project |
16 hrs |
$1,920.00 |
Final Project report is developed |
16 hrs |
$1,920.00 |
System Analyst |
552 hrs |
$82,800.00 |
Initiation is built |
48 hrs |
$7,200.00 |
Milestone Requirements are formed |
56 hrs |
$8,400.00 |
Implemening system designed |
80 hrs |
$12,000.00 |
Implementation Phase modification |
64 hrs |
$9,600.00 |
Equipments are verified |
72 hrs |
$10,800.00 |
Reviewing the testing Phase |
64 hrs |
$9,600.00 |
Entire plan is developed |
56 hrs |
$8,400.00 |
Test result in executed |
0 hrs |
$0.00 |
Risk Assessment |
56 hrs |
$8,400.00 |
Development of risk register |
56 hrs |
$8,400.00 |
System Developer |
528 hrs |
$52,800.00 |
Analysis of various vendors |
32 hrs |
$3,200.00 |
System Design is made |
40 hrs |
$4,000.00 |
Milestone Requirements are formed |
56 hrs |
$5,600.00 |
Implementation Phase modification |
64 hrs |
$6,400.00 |
Equipments are verified |
72 hrs |
$7,200.00 |
Initiation of testing phase |
40 hrs |
$4,000.00 |
Reporting the testing phase |
8 hrs |
$800.00 |
Entire plan is developed |
56 hrs |
$5,600.00 |
Test Plan is developed |
72 hrs |
$7,200.00 |
Test result in executed |
0 hrs |
$0.00 |
Recognition of risk factors |
40 hrs |
$4,000.00 |
Risk Mitigation |
48 hrs |
$4,800.00 |
Risk Analyzer |
216 hrs |
$19,440.00 |
Recognition of risk factors |
40 hrs |
$3,600.00 |
Risk Assessment |
56 hrs |
$5,040.00 |
Development of risk register |
56 hrs |
$5,040.00 |
Risk Impact is modified |
64 hrs |
$5,760.00 |
Business Analyst |
152 hrs |
$15,200.00 |
Specification of Project is Evaluated |
32 hrs |
$3,200.00 |
Project Kick off meeting |
32 hrs |
$3,200.00 |
Capability analysis of vendors |
40 hrs |
$4,000.00 |
Planning Schedule |
32 hrs |
$3,200.00 |
Final Project report is developed |
16 hrs |
$1,600.00 |
System Tester |
344 hrs |
$27,520.00 |
Equipments are verified |
72 hrs |
$5,760.00 |
Initiation of testing phase |
40 hrs |
$3,200.00 |
Reporting the testing phase |
8 hrs |
$640.00 |
Reviewing the testing Phase |
64 hrs |
$5,120.00 |
Test Plan is developed |
72 hrs |
$5,760.00 |
Test result in executed |
0 hrs |
$0.00 |
Recognition of risk factors |
40 hrs |
$3,200.00 |
Risk Mitigation |
48 hrs |
$3,840.00 |
Part Three: Project Plan
The project plan for the project of “Development of the Ticketing System for RALS” is given in the tabular formal below,
Task Name |
Duration |
Start |
Finish |
Development of Ticketing System for RALS |
154 days |
Mon 1/1/18 |
Thu 8/2/18 |
Conceptualization and project initialization |
29 days |
Mon 1/1/18 |
Thu 2/8/18 |
Development of Project Charter |
11 days |
Mon 1/1/18 |
Mon 1/15/18 |
Requirement Analysis |
3 days |
Mon 1/1/18 |
Wed 1/3/18 |
Specification of Project is Evaluated |
4 days |
Thu 1/4/18 |
Tue 1/9/18 |
Project Kick off meeting |
4 days |
Wed 1/10/18 |
Mon 1/15/18 |
Vendor appointment |
18 days |
Tue 1/16/18 |
Thu 2/8/18 |
Analysis of various vendors |
4 days |
Tue 1/16/18 |
Fri 1/19/18 |
Capability analysis of vendors |
5 days |
Mon 1/22/18 |
Fri 1/26/18 |
Budget Planning |
5 days |
Mon 1/29/18 |
Fri 2/2/18 |
Planning Schedule |
4 days |
Mon 2/5/18 |
Thu 2/8/18 |
Project is Initiated |
0 days |
Thu 2/8/18 |
Thu 2/8/18 |
Ticketing system Design Phase |
22 days |
Fri 2/9/18 |
Mon 3/12/18 |
Labour Management is planned |
4 days |
Fri 2/9/18 |
Wed 2/14/18 |
System Design is made |
5 days |
Thu 2/15/18 |
Wed 2/21/18 |
Initiation is built |
6 days |
Thu 2/22/18 |
Thu 3/1/18 |
Milestone Requirements are formed |
7 days |
Fri 3/2/18 |
Mon 3/12/18 |
Milestone: Design is completed of the Ticket System |
0 days |
Mon 3/12/18 |
Mon 3/12/18 |
Implementation of the Ticketing system |
36 days |
Tue 3/13/18 |
Tue 5/1/18 |
Implementing system designed |
10 days |
Tue 3/13/18 |
Mon 3/26/18 |
Implementation Phase modification |
8 days |
Tue 3/27/18 |
Thu 4/5/18 |
Requirement of design implemented |
9 days |
Fri 4/6/18 |
Wed 4/18/18 |
Equipments are verified |
9 days |
Thu 4/19/18 |
Tue 5/1/18 |
Milestone: Implementation is completed for Ticketing System |
0 days |
Tue 5/1/18 |
Tue 5/1/18 |
Testing phase |
30 days |
Wed 5/2/18 |
Tue 6/12/18 |
Initiation of testing phase |
5 days |
Wed 5/2/18 |
Tue 5/8/18 |
Reporting the testing phase |
1 day |
Wed 5/9/18 |
Wed 5/9/18 |
Reviewing the testing Phase |
8 days |
Thu 5/10/18 |
Mon 5/21/18 |
Entire plan is developed |
7 days |
Tue 5/22/18 |
Wed 5/30/18 |
Test Plan is developed |
9 days |
Thu 5/31/18 |
Tue 6/12/18 |
Test result in executed |
0 days |
Tue 6/12/18 |
Tue 6/12/18 |
Milestone: Final test results are formed |
0 days |
Tue 6/12/18 |
Tue 6/12/18 |
Risk Management Phase |
33 days |
Wed 6/13/18 |
Fri 7/27/18 |
Recognition of risk factors |
5 days |
Wed 6/13/18 |
Tue 6/19/18 |
Risk Assessment |
7 days |
Wed 6/20/18 |
Thu 6/28/18 |
Risk Mitigation |
6 days |
Fri 6/29/18 |
Fri 7/6/18 |
Development of risk register |
7 days |
Mon 7/9/18 |
Tue 7/17/18 |
Risk Impact is modified |
8 days |
Wed 7/18/18 |
Fri 7/27/18 |
Milestone: Risk Management Plan is developed |
0 days |
Fri 7/27/18 |
Fri 7/27/18 |
Project closure phase |
4 days |
Mon 7/30/18 |
Thu 8/2/18 |
Success Evaluation of project |
2 days |
Mon 7/30/18 |
Tue 7/31/18 |
Final Project report is developed |
2 days |
Wed 8/1/18 |
Thu 8/2/18 |
Milestone: Project is closed |
0 days |
Thu 8/2/18 |
Thu 8/2/18 |
The WBS of the project of “Development of the Ticketing System for RALS” is shown in the table below,
WBS |
Task Name |
0 |
Development of Ticketing System for RALS |
1 |
Conceptualization and project initialization |
1.1 |
Development of Project Charter |
1.1.1 |
Requirement Analysis |
1.1.2 |
Specification of Project is Evaluated |
1.1.3 |
Project Kick off meeting |
1.2 |
Vendor appointment |
1.2.1 |
Analysis of various vendors |
1.2.2 |
Capability analysis of vendors |
1.2.3 |
Budget Planning |
1.2.4 |
Planning Schedule |
1.2.5 |
Project is Initiated |
2 |
Ticketing system Design Phase |
2.1 |
Labor Management is planned |
2.2 |
System Design is made |
2.3 |
Initiation is built |
2.4 |
Milestone Requirements are formed |
M1 |
Milestone: Design is completed of the Ticket System |
3 |
Implementation of the Ticketing system |
3.1 |
Implementing system designed |
3.2 |
Implementation Phase modification |
3.3 |
Requirement of design implemented |
3.4 |
Equipments are verified |
M2 |
Milestone: Implementation is completed for Ticketing System |
4 |
Testing phase |
4.1 |
Initiation of testing phase |
4.2 |
Reporting the testing phase |
4.3 |
Reviewing the testing Phase |
4.4 |
Entire plan is developed |
4.5 |
Test Plan is developed |
4.6 |
Test result in executed |
M3 |
Milestone: Final test results are formed |
5 |
Risk Management Phase |
5.1 |
Recognition of risk factors |
5.2 |
Risk Assessment |
5.3 |
Risk Mitigation |
5.4 |
Development of risk register |
5.5 |
Risk Impact is modified |
M4 |
Milestone: Risk Management Plan is developed |
6 |
Project closure phase |
6.1 |
Success Evaluation of project |
6.2 |
Final Project report is developed |
M5 |
Milestone: Project is closed |
Part Four: Risk Analysis and Management Plan for RALS
System failure: System failure is the first ranked project risks that result in failing the operations of the project. The failure of the project would tend to imply the hindrance in the operations of the project. A detail of the risk is given below,
Ref no: RTF2001
Category: Technical
Triggers: System Flaws
Potential Responses: Preliminary testing and Prototyping
Risk Owner: IT Engineer
Probability: Likely
Impact: Critical
Financial Issues: Financial Issue is the second ranked project risks that result in failing the operations of the project. The failure of the project would tend to imply the hindrance in the operations of the project. A detail of the risk is given below,
Ref no: RTF2002
Category: Financial
Triggers: Insufficient resources in project
Potential Responses: Use of provisional resources
Risk Owner: Budgeter
Probability: Possible
Impact: Medium
Design Flaws: Design Flaws is the third ranked project risks that result in failing the operations of the project. The failure of the project would tend to imply the hindrance in the operations of the project. A detail of the risk is given below,
Ref no: RTF2003
Category: Technical
Triggers: Designing errors
Potential Responses: SDLC implementation for system designing
Risk Owner: Designer
Probability: Likely
Impact: Medium
Management Issues: Management Issues are the third ranked project risks that result in failing the operations of the project. The failure of the project would tend to imply the hindrance in the operations of the project. A detail of the risk is given below,
Ref no: RTF2004
Category: Operational
Triggers: Lack of the Strategic management framework
Potential Responses: Deploying strategic management structure in the project
Risk Owner: Project Manager
Probability: Possible
Impact: Medium
Delay in Project: Delay in Project is the third ranked project risks that result in failing the operations of the project. The failure of the project would tend to imply the hindrance in the operations of the project. A detail of the risk is given below,
Ref no: RTF2005
Category: Performance
Triggers: Issues in Project Management and Operations
Potential Responses: Deploying scheduling methods of project and system administration
Risk Owner: Planner
Probability: Almost Certain
Impact: Very Low
Quality Management Plan
The association of RALS would incorporate the utilization of task advancement standards for building up the successful and enhanced administrations in the association with the assistance of Ticket System to be produced. The quality management plan is developed for integration of the effective operations for the project.
A set of verification activities: The quality affirmation can be checked by playing out a few tests like discovery testing comes about, UX testing, and execution testing.
A set of validation activities: The quality affirmation can be confirmed by playing out a few activities like Identification of the Quality Issues, Development of Quality Management Plan, and Implementation of the Quality Management Plan
a. Annotated Bibliography
As characterized by Kendrick (2015), the undertaking comprises of various dangers and dangers. The examination of the different variables of hazard would have a tendency to enhanced the advancement of the venture administration ideas would be useful for the improvement of the hazard evaluation for the undertaking. The basic examination of the task advance would tend to utilize the administration of operations for the venture. Braglia and Frosolini (2014) have sent the utilization of the venture joining and its pertinence with the administration of the undertaking for data framework improvement. The advancement of the venture for the execution of the data framework would contain the administration of the operations and its arrangement with the framework improvement. The investigation of the article by Stark (2015), would help in building up some arrangement for the change of the operations and creating successful correspondence for the operations of the venture. The examination of the diverse factors of risk would tend to upgraded the headway of the endeavour organization thoughts would be valuable for the change of the danger evaluation for the undertaking. The essential examination of the venture progress would have a tendency to use the organization of operations for the assignment.
- Successful finishing the task in assessed time
- Following the task spending plan and asset
- Meeting the extents of the task
Bibliography
Amrollahi, A., Ghapanchi, A. H., &Talaei-Khoei, A. (2014). Three decades of research on strategic information system plan development.Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 34(1), 84.
Braglia, M., &Frosolini, M. (2014).An integrated approach to implement project management information systems within the extended enterprise.International Journal of Project Management, 32(1), 18-29.
Coronel, C., & Morris, S. (2016). Database systems: design, implementation, & management. Cengage Learning.
Galliers, R. D., &Leidner, D. E. (2014). Strategic information management: challenges and strategies in managing information systems. Routledge.
Garton, C., & McCulloch, E. (2012). Fundamentals of Technology Project Management. MC Press, LLC.
Goetsch, D. L., & Davis, S. B. (2014). Quality management for organizational excellence.pearson.
Hubicki, M. (2014). Risk Management Plan.
Kendrick, T. (2015). Identifying and managing project risk: essential tools for failure-proofing your project. AMACOM Div American Mgmt Assn.
Nanda, V. (2016). Quality management system handbook for product development companies.CRC Press.
Pritchard, C. L., & PMP, P. R. (2014). Risk management: concepts and guidance. CRC Press.
Schwalbe, K. (2015). Information technology project management.Cengage Learning.
Stark, J. (2015). Product lifecycle management.In Product Lifecycle Management (pp. 1-29).Springer International Publishing.
Verburg, R. M., Bosch-Sijtsema, P., &Vartiainen, M. (2013).Getting it done: Critical success factors for project managers in virtual work settings.International Journal of Project Management, 31(1), 68-79.
Verzuh, E. (2015). The fast forward MBA in project management.John Wiley & Sons.
Buy MNG00785 Project Management-Quality Management Plan Answers Online
Talk to our expert to get the help with MNG00785 Project Management-Quality Management Plan Answers to complete your assessment on time and boost your grades now
The main aim/motive of the management assignment help services is to get connect with a greater number of students, and effectively help, and support them in getting completing their assignments the students also get find this a wonderful opportunity where they could effectively learn more about their topics, as the experts also have the best team members with them in which all the members effectively support each other to get complete their diploma assignments. They complete the assessments of the students in an appropriate manner and deliver them back to the students before the due date of the assignment so that the students could timely submit this, and can score higher marks. The experts of the assignment help services at urgenthomework.com are so much skilled, capable, talented, and experienced in their field of programming homework help writing assignments, so, for this, they can effectively write the best economics assignment help services.