Mgt5Mpt Management Practice And Theory Assessment Answers

Write an essay-style response to this question, referring to the current academic literature on this topic. You may find this resource on Essay Writing helpful.

The main body of your essay will consist of paragraphs, which are akin to building blocks in the construction of your argument. Ensure that you:

• develop a discussion, informed by the key academics in the field, which answers the essay question
• demonstrate your knowledge of the field
• offer exposition and evidence to develop your arguments.  Evidence will be the references to seminal works and key empirical studies
• use relevant examples and authoritative quotes - however only use quotes for effect.  Excessive quoting does not demonstrate your understanding of the field.
• if your question has multiple parts, consider using subheadings to break up the text into a logical structure.

Answer: 

Introduction:

Paradigm War has a huge impact on the organisational theories and their executions in the organisations. It changes the thinking level of the people. It also changes the study approaches of organisation theory. Paradigm gives importance to the managers of an association. The manager is one of the most valuable assets of an organisation. Manager or leader of a company has a huge responsibility to control the whole organisation. The growth of a firm very much depends on its manager and his capabilities. Therefore his role takes a necessary part in shaping the organisational outcomes. A company needs a good manager to expand their business all over the world. Ethnicity is another major counterpart needed for a company. This ethnicity influences the working growth and official enlargements of a firm. The manager of a company maintains this ethnicity in the workplace. This assignment is based on the topic of the role of managers in shaping the ethnicity and outcomes of an organisation based on the Paradigm War in organisational theories. A brief introduction to the topic is included in this assignment. The essay also holds an elaborate discussion about managers and their roles regarding the organisational growth. It also talks about different organisational theories based on the Paradigm War. The essay also discusses the various attributes which a manager should possess regarding giving the company a vigorous augmentation. Some useful examples are also given in this assignment. The essay finishes with an elaborated conclusion part. The conclusion part holds a summary of the topic discussed above in the essay

Organisational theories for action:

The organisational theories that should be implemented for the development of the organisational requirement are discussed in the below-

Administrative theory:

This regulatory theory consists of the attributes like –

• The protection of job is one of the most important things to be organised by the company. The secured job opportunity helps the workers to carry out their work in such kind of organisations.
• The segmentation in work should be placed. The formation of different teams helps the agency to provide specialisation in work (Farmbry, 2010).
• The justification in the group should take place so that no one can be ill-treated in the company.
• Apart from this, the formation of different working groups should be implemented; proposal and the centralization of management should be undertaken.

Advances of Weber’s Bureaucrat:

• The functions of the company should be governed according to the legal procedures of the company.
• The selection process of the company should not be based on the nepotism.
• The formation of the administration should be constructed in a way that the company can do the works properly (Administrative Section, 2010).

Social and technical approach:

• The utilisation of new and innovative technology should happen. The work of the company should take place thinking about the persons who use to work in the company.
• The usage of the technology should be executed. But the company has to make sure that the environment of the organisation should not be affected (Jones, 2016).

The approach of the System:

• The company should govern their work freely by allowing the workers to do their works according to their best knowledge. The substantial environment of the organisation should be scrutinised for the betterment of the company.
• The ultimate purpose and aim of the organisation should be fulfilled by using the important attributes.
• The level of communication should be upgraded by providing quality training to the workers of the firm. The communication process can bring about many approaches for the company to be developed.
• The relation among the workers and the co-workers should be maintained in a way that the formation of the chaotic situation will never take place. This will help to keep the environment of the organisation reliable for the work (Baldus, 2014).

Exploring the Paradigm Wars in organisation theory:

Paradigm War plays an important role in the process of organisational theory. Organisation theory mainly discusses the manager and his role in the company. By discussing the role of managers in the growth of a company, the importance of Paradigm Wars in organisation theory can be achieved (Bartlett, Ghoshal and Beamish, 2014). Managers play an important role in the formation of an organisational outcome. They have a huge impact on the development of a company. The key roles of managers are discussed below:

Perfect strategy maker: The classical approach gives the right to the manager to make strategies apt for his company. A manager is known for his innovative and valuable strategies (Billett, 2010). He can formulate strategies in any situation and any circumstances. There are so many barriers and obstacles that hit a company and create problems for the development of that company. The manager is the only person who can deal with these types of situations. He makes strategies according to the temperament and value system of a problem. He throws different approaches to control the crisis that happens inside the workplace. Paradigm Wars influences the classical approach through the managers and their roles in the company development. For example, when a company faces monetary loss, the whole company including the employees suffers thoroughly. A real manager can manage this situation quite easily. He makes creative strategies which are appropriate for that situation. In the banking crisis of 2007, many organisations experienced a huge loss in the marketplace. Their share markets were also compromised. It was the managers of the big companies, who cope up the situation with their innovative strategies. So the strategies of a manager influence the outcomes of an association (Cunningham, 2016).

Proper implementation of a strategy: It is true that new and trending strategies can boost up the success level of a company (Francescato and Aber, 2015). But a strategy is of no use if is not properly implemented. The classical approach also helps a manager to obtain the quality, with the help of which he could easily execute any strategy. Managers make a strategy, and then they show the right path to carry out that strategy. Not every problem follows the same solution. There are different solutions for different problems, and the applying path of those solutions is also different. A manager shows the different paths to his/her employees. So that they can apply the clever strategy in a proper way. This way the manager could control the technical issues and make progress in the marketplace. The theories of Paradigm Wars also utter the same thing. For instance, when the stakeholders of a firm experiences problems, the manager of that company apply an economic evaluation in such a way, that the issue of the stakeholders solves immediately (The Critical Journal of Organization, Theory and Society, 2012). This way the trust bond between the company and its stakeholders gets upgraded. Thus it is another key role of the manager in shaping the company outcomes.

The outsized dream of a manager: The modern approach influences the outlook of a manager (Call for Papers - Special Issue for Organization: The Critical Journal of Organization, Theory and Society, 2014). The foundation of a firm depends mainly on the grand idea of the manager. A quote must be acknowledged in this termp;dream bigp dreams comes true'. Managers see big progressing dreams for their companies. These dreams help them to plan the future work suitable for the organisation. They implant their dreams and goals inside the mind of the employees. This way the employees also understand the objectives and goals of the company. They get motivated and work even harder to fulfil those dreams. A quotation of W. Scott would be sufficed in this situation: The distinctive qualities of modern organisation theory are its conceptual, analytical base, its reliance on empirical research data and, above all, it's integrating nature. These qualities are framed in a philosophy which accepts the premise that the only meaningful way to study organisation is to study it as a system The outsized dream of a manager helps to run an organisation and boost up its success rate. For example, McDonald's started their business as a small food chain. It is the bigger dream of the managers that expanded this food service all around the world. It became one of the largest food chains in the whole world. Thus, managerial dreams play an important role in the progress level of a company (Pick, 2016). In this way, the paradigm wars help to shape the organisation theories and achieve successful outcomes.

Passionate manager: Modern method also collects positivity from the enthusiastic nature of a manager (Celebrating Organization Theory, 2014). The enthusiasm of a manager deeply influences the growth level of an organisation. A passionate manager can motivate the workers in many ways. If the manager of a company stays enthusiastic, then a certain comforting atmosphere formed in the workplace. Employees can perform their duties easily and with enthusiasm. The whole process ultimately generates a positive effect on the organisational outcomes. The passions of a manager also create positivity among the workers. For instance, Thomas Cook is a big airline company. Their business is expanded all over the world. Paradigm wars persuade the modern theory of this business also. It is not just money and good employees that lifted the company to the highest peak of success; their managers are very passionate about their works and the organisation. Their enthusiasm runs through the behaviour of the recruits also (Boyd, 2015). This enthusiasm helps them to satisfy their client requirements and makes an advantageous position in the marketplace.

Apparent managerial assessment structure: Neo-classical technique controls the managerial assessment structure of an organisation (Tsoukas and Chia, 2011). A manager can influence the organisational outcomes through his evaluating power. A manager must have a proper outlook about what to sell and how to sell. This attribute of a manager plays an essential part in the growth rate of a firm. If a manager properly understands the target market and ethics of a company, then he/she can easily teach the workers about those targets and ethics. This way a coherent relationship between the manager and the worker could be maintained. This will ultimately shape the company in a positive way. Paradigm wars have a large impact on the evaluation process of a company, and it is linked to the modern organisational approach. Thus the assessing power of a manager plays an important role in the optimistic formation of an association (Dues, 2010)

Recruitment process: The role of manager influences both direct and indirect processes that are connected with the company outcomes. The modern theory changes the recruitment method of an organisation. Employees are one of the most valuable possessions of a firm. The managers play an essential role in the employee hiring process. They have the capability and vision to select appropriate recruits for their company (Shepherd and Challenger, 2012). The right employees can augment the success level of a firm, at the same time inappropriate recruits can harm the growth standards of a firm. So it is very important to choose the suitable employees based on the job criteria. Managers perform this duty successfully and ultimately give a positive remark on the yearly outcomes of that organisation. For example, the directors of KFC choose their employees based on the various job criteria. They select humble and modest recruits because the customer is everything for their business, and they must maintain their reputation among the customers. Thus they have become one of the greatest food industries in the world. Therefore the role of a manager influences the outcome process of an organisation indirectly (Eitel, 2011).

Sincerity and reliability: Sincerity and reliability is the two valuable feature of classical approach which is affected by the Paradigm Wars (Sharma, 2010). Honesty and credibility are those aspects of a manager which helps him shape the outcomes of his/her company. Sincerity is one of the greatest attributes that a manager can possess. Without seriousness, no manager can run a big company and make it successful. This sincerity of a leader can persuade the expansion of an organisation. Another significant characteristic of a manager is his reliability. A manager must possess this quality so that the stakeholders, employees and customers can trust the outlook of the manager. Managerial reliability creates a dependable environment inside the office. This positive atmosphere attracts more funds and investors. This way the success rate of the organisation boosts up. For instance, Zara is a famous clothing brand, and the success of this company depends mainly upon the sincerity and reliability of its managers. So it can be said that a real and reliable manager plays a crucial role in the development of an association. Organisation theory thus explores the Paradigm Wars through the role of managers in the success level of an association (Jones and Kennedy, 2011).

Conclusion:

Paradigm wars created a new period in which people can look into things differently. It changed the outlook of study and made it bold and interesting. Organisation theories also get influenced by the touch of Paradigm Wars. The three major approaches- modern, classical and neo-classical have a huge impact on Paradigm thinking in their methods. These theories help to understand the managerial role and importance in shaping the organisational outcomes. The classical method highlights the reliability, strategy making and the executing capability of the manager. It depicts the key attributes of the manager that could influence the outcomes or results of an organisation. The neo-classical method highlights the managerial evaluation structure. With the help of this structure, a manager can freely assess or evaluate the requirements of the customers and the shareholders. It also helps them to evaluate the growth rate of the workers. The growth rate of the workers eventually affects the positive outcomes of a company. The modern approach is also paramount, and it is also influenced by the Paradigm Wars. The modern technique manipulates the outlook, passion and recruiting capability of a manager. It shows that with a broad outlook and enthusiastic nature, one can achieve immense success. Similarly, with these attributes, a manager can help a company to attain their target market. This method also shows the recruiting talent of a manager. A good manager can hire appropriate persons, which eventually helps him to shape the outcomes of his/her organisation. Thus the Paradigm wars and organisation theory are related to each other. They are also connected to the role of the managers in shaping the organisational outcomes.

References:

Administrative Section. (2010). Transfusion, 34(S10), pp.81s-99s.

Baldus, B. (2014). Contingency, novelty and choice. Cultural evolution as internal selection. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 45(2), pp.214-237.

Bartlett, C., Ghoshal, S. and Beamish, P. (2014). Transnational management. 1st ed. Boston: McGraw-Hill Education.

Billett, S. (2010). Learning through practice. 1st ed. Dordrecht: Springer.

Boyd, N. (2015). ORGANIZATION THEORY IN COMMUNITY CONTEXTS. Journal of Community Psychology, 43(6), pp.649-653.

Cunningham, J. (2016). Strategic human resource management in the public arena. 1st ed. London ;New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

Call for Papers - Special Issue for Organization: The Critical Journal of Organization, Theory and Society. (2014). Organization, 21(6), pp.954-956.

Celebrating Organization Theory. (2014). Journal of Management Studies, 52(2), pp.285-287.

Dues, M. (2010). The art of conflict management. 1st ed. Chantilly, VA: Teaching Co.

Eitel, K. (2011). Paradigm wars. 1st ed. Eugene: Wipf & Stock Publishers.

Francescato, D. and Aber, M. (2015). LEARNING FROM ORGANIZATIONAL THEORY TO BUILD ORGANIZATIONAL EMPOWERMENT. Journal of Community Psychology, 43(6), pp.717-738.

Farmbry, K. (2010). Introduction—Administrative Theory in a Post-Postracial America. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 32(4), pp.520-531.

Jones, N. (2016). The Technical Communicator as Advocate. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 46(3), pp.342-361.

Jones, C. and Kennedy, G. (2011). Stepping beyond the paradigm wars: pluralist methods for research in learning technology. Research in Learning Technology, 19(sup1), p.7798.

Pick, D. (2016). Rethinking organization theory: The fold, the rhizome and the seam between organization and the literary. Organization, p.135050841667717.

Sharma, A. (2010). Cyber Wars: A Paradigm Shift from Means to Ends. Strategic Analysis, 34(1), pp.62-73.

Shepherd, C. and Challenger, R. (2012). Revisiting Paradigm(s) in Management Research: A Rhetorical Analysis of the Paradigm Wars. International Journal of Management Reviews, 15(2), pp.225-244.

The Critical Journal of Organization, Theory and Society. (2012). Organization, 19(2), pp.263-265.

Tsoukas, H. and Chia, R. (2011). Philosophy and organization theory. 1st ed. Bingley, UK: Emerald.