Mba 530 Managing Strategic Business Assessment Answers
Questions:
1. Adopt System Approach to Analyze an Initiative
2. Select Business Initiative/Project Using Weighted Approach
3. Identify Project Stakeholders
4. Determine the Project’s Assumptions and Constraints
5. Develop the Business Case to Obtain Senior Management Support
6. Develop the Project Charter
7. Develop the Stakeholder Communication Matrix
8. Study the Relationship Using the Triple Constraint View
9. Develop Project Scope Statement
10. Develop the Work Breakdown Structure (WBS)
11. Develop the Responsibility Assignment Matrix (RAM)
12. Adopt the Program Evaluation and Review Technique (PERT)
13. Use the Critical Path Methodology (CPM)
14. Develop Project Gantt Chart
15. Compare the Costs Estimate Techniques
16. Apply the Earned Value Management (EVM) to Monitor Progress
17. Adopt the Cause and Effect Approach in Quality Management
18. Issue Progress Report
19. Identify Project Risks
20. Manage Risks (Risk Registers and Response Strategies)
21. Manage Project Change Request
Answer:
System Approach
It is found that for analyzing the initiative of the project from its initial stage, it is the responsibility of the project manager to hire experienced as well as right stakeholders of the project. The project managers must also engage in creating proper project schedule that not only elaborates the activities that are required to be performed within the project but also reflects on the budget that is needed in order to finish the project. In addition to this, the project must reflect the requirement of resources for each of the project activities so that depending on their ability and experience they are appointed within the project.
Business Initiative
E-business can be helpful in driving the approach of buying property to much more advances that not only satisfy the customers bit also minimizes the time. With the help of help of e-business, an individual can get information about the property sellers and can select their right choice by not wasting much time.
Identify Project Stakeholders
The stakeholders who are involved within the project are listed below:
- Project manager
- Broker
- Organizer
- Solicitor
- Contractor
- Project Planner
Assumptions and Constraints
Assumptions
The assumptions of the project are as follows:
- To complete the project within the time that is around 40 days
- To finish the project within the budget that is around $1,051,640
- To follow the scope of the project
Constraints
The constraints of the project are listed below:
Time: It is the responsibility of the project manager to manage the time of the project effectively for finishing the entire project within the expected time.
Budget: The project manager must finish the entire project within the budget that is approved.
Scope: The scope of the project must be followed properly for finishing the project effectively within the expected time and budget.
Business Case
The paper mainly focuses on “buying a summer apartment in Big Ben, London”. It is found that due to the absence of summer apartment, the family members face lot of problems and challenges in spending their summer holidays. In order to resolve the challenges, the family wants to buy an apartment in the area of Big Ben is so that they can relax and can enjoy their days of summer holidays properly.
Develop the Project Charter
Project description
The project reflects on buying a summer apartment in Big Ben area of London. A summer apartment is generally needed by the family so that the problems that they face in absence of a summer apartment got resolved and they will get the chance of enjoying their summer holidays with their family members. The project of buying an apartment will be completed within 40 days by utilizing budget of around $1,051,640.
Project deliverables
The deliverables of the project are as follows:
- Viewing apartment in London
- Valuation survey
- Property survey
- Building or structural survey
- Finalizing an offer
- Proper communication
- Conveyancing and searches
- Exchange of contracts
- Enquiries on the property
- Transfer of funds
High level project deliverables
The high-level deliverables of the project are as follows:
- Arranging a solicitor
- RICS condition report
- RICS homebuyer report
- Finalizing the mortgage
- Exchange of contracts
- Signing contracts
- Transfer of funds
- Setting mutually agreed completion date
Team members and roles
The team members and their roles are provided in the below table:
Team member |
Roles |
Mobile |
|
Signature |
Project manager |
The project manager manages the entire project. |
NA |
NA |
William Watson |
Broker |
The broker engages in searching for the summer apartments. |
NA |
NA |
James Anderson |
Organizer |
The organizer engages in organizing the paper works for the apartment. |
NA |
NA |
James Anderson |
Solicitor |
They generally help in surveying valuation as well as property. |
NA |
NA |
Andrew Lee |
Contractor |
The contractor engages in taking the contract for buying an apartment. |
NA |
NA |
James smith |
Project Planner |
The project planner engages in making proper planning for the project. |
NA |
NA |
Stephen smith |
Stakeholder Communication Matrix
The stakeholder’s communication matrix is provided in the table below:
Purpose |
Frequency |
Responsible person |
Ways of communication |
To know about the value of the property |
Once |
Project manager |
Video conference, face to face |
To finalize the offer |
Once |
Contractor |
Video conference, face to face |
For exchanging the contracts |
weekly |
Contractor |
Video conference, face to face |
For organizing finances |
Weekly |
Organizer |
Video conference, face to face |
Triple Constraint View
The triple constraint view of the project is provided below:
Time:40 days
Scope: To buy summer apartment
Cost: $1,051,640.00
Project Scope Statement
Business Process
The paper reflects on buying an apartment in Big Ben, London for providing the facility of proper relaxation as well as enjoyment during the months of summer to the family members.
Project Goals
The main goal of the project is to buy a summer apartment in Big Ben area in London in order to can relax can enjoy the days of summer holidays properly.
Project work statement
The project work statement reflects that the entire project will be completed within the time period of 40 days by utilizing budget of around $1,051,640. The work statement of the project also helps in elaborating the activities and deliverables of the project.
Deliverables
The deliverables of the project include:
- Viewing apartment in London
- Valuation survey
- Property survey
- Building or structural survey
- Finalizing an offer
Milestones
Milestone |
Completion date |
Milestone 1: Completion of initiation phase |
Thu 02-08-18 |
Milestone 2: Solicitor arrangement phase completion |
Wed 22-08-18 |
Milestone 3: Mortgage finalization completion |
Fri 07-09-18 |
Milestone 4: Completion of closure phase |
Mon 17-09-18 |
Constraints
The constraints of the project include:
- Completion of the project within the expected time that is 40 days
- Buying the apartment within the budget that is around $1,051,640.
Work Breakdown Structure
WBS level |
WBS |
Task Name |
Duration |
Responsible |
0 |
|
Buying a summer apartment in London |
40 days |
|
1 |
1 |
Initiation phase |
8 days |
|
2 |
1.1 |
Developing plan |
1 day |
Project manager |
2 |
1.2 |
Organizing finances |
3 days |
Organizer |
2 |
1.3 |
Register with MylondonHome |
1 day |
Project planner |
2 |
1.4 |
Search for property |
1 day |
Broker |
2 |
1.5 |
Viewing apartment in London |
1 day |
Project manager |
2 |
1.6 |
Putting forward an offer |
1 day |
Project planner |
1 |
2 |
Arranging a solicitor |
14 days |
|
2 |
2.1 |
Valuation survey |
2 days |
Organizer |
2 |
2.2 |
Property survey |
2 days |
Broker |
2 |
2.3 |
RICS condition report |
3 days |
Contractor |
2 |
2.4 |
RICS homebuyer report |
2 days |
Organizer |
2 |
2.5 |
Building or structural survey |
3 days |
Contractor |
2 |
2.6 |
Finalizing an offer |
1 day |
Project planner |
2 |
2.7 |
Proper communication |
1 day |
Project manager |
1 |
3 |
Finalizing the mortgage |
12 days |
|
2 |
3.1 |
Offer accepted |
1 day |
Contractor |
2 |
3.2 |
Conveyancing and searches |
2 days |
Project planner |
2 |
3.3 |
Exchange of contracts |
1 day |
Contractor |
2 |
3.4 |
Enquiries on the property |
2 days |
Solicitor, Apartment cost [1] |
2 |
3.5 |
Exchange of contracts |
2 days |
Project manager |
2 |
3.6 |
Signing contracts |
1 day |
Project manager |
2 |
3.7 |
Transfer of funds |
2 days |
Broker |
2 |
3.8 |
Setting manually agreed completion date |
1 day |
Project manager |
1 |
4 |
Closure phase |
6 days |
|
2 |
4.1 |
Remaining money owed |
2 days |
Organizer, Other cost [1] |
2 |
4.2 |
Paying a mortgage account fee |
2 days |
Contractor |
2 |
4.3 |
Paying solicitor bill |
1 day |
Solicitor |
2 |
4.4 |
Completion |
1 day |
Project planner |
Responsibility Assignment Matrix
Responsibility assignment matrix (RACI) illustrates the participation of different roles in competing various tasks or deliverables of the project within the business process. RACI stands for:
R-Responsible
A-Accountable
C-Consult
I-Informed
Activities |
Project manager |
Broker |
Organizer |
Solicitor |
Contractor |
Project planner |
Developing plan |
R, A |
|
I |
|
|
C |
Organizing finances |
I |
|
R, A |
|
|
C |
Register with MylondonHome |
R, A |
|
I |
|
|
C |
Search for property |
I |
R, A |
|
|
C |
|
Viewing apartment in London |
I |
R, A |
|
|
C |
|
Putting forward an offer |
I |
R, A |
|
|
C |
|
Valuation survey |
|
C |
R, A |
|
I |
|
Property survey |
|
C |
R, A |
|
I |
|
RICS condition report |
|
C |
R, A |
|
I |
|
RICS homebuyer report |
|
C |
R, A |
|
I |
|
Building or structural survey |
|
C |
R, A |
|
I |
|
Finalizing an offer |
I |
R, A |
|
|
C |
I |
Proper communication |
I |
|
R, A |
|
|
C |
Offer accepted |
I |
|
|
R, A |
C |
|
Conveyancing and searches |
I |
|
|
R, A |
C |
|
Exchange of contracts |
I |
|
|
R, A |
C |
|
Enquiries on the property |
|
R, A |
C |
I |
|
|
Exchange of contracts |
|
R, A |
C |
I |
|
|
Signing contracts |
I |
R, A |
|
|
|
C |
Transfer of funds |
I |
|
R, A |
C |
|
|
Setting agreed completion date |
I |
|
|
R, A |
C |
I |
Remaining money owed |
I |
R, A |
|
|
C |
I |
Paying a mortgage account fee |
I |
|
R, A |
|
|
C |
Paying solicitor bill |
I |
R, A |
|
|
C |
I |
15. Costs Estimate Techniques
The most important cost estimate techniques are compared in the table below:
Analogous estimating |
Parametric estimating |
Three-point estimating |
Bottom up estimating |
This technique is generally used for estimating the cost of the project when very much less detail about the project is present |
It generally utilizes historical data in order to calculate the cost but it generally utilizes statistical data. |
This technique is generally utilized for reducing the biases as well as uncertainties in the cost estimation technique |
This technique of estimation is considered to be very much accurate as well as time consuming. |
It is considered as the fastest technique for estimating cost accurately |
This is much more accurate than analogous estimation |
It is more accurate than analogous and parametric techniques |
This is the most accurate technique. |
Earned Value Management
The progress of the project is identified with the help of the earned value management that is provided below:
Task Name |
Planned Value - PV (BCWS) |
Earned Value - EV (BCWP) |
AC (ACWP) |
SV |
CV |
EAC |
BAC |
VAC |
Buying a summer apartment in London |
$ 0.00 |
$ 0.00 |
$ 0.00 |
$ 0.00 |
$ 0.00 |
$ 1,051,640.00 |
$ 0.00 |
-$ 1,051,640.00 |
Initiation phase |
$ 0.00 |
$ 0.00 |
$ 0.00 |
$ 0.00 |
$ 0.00 |
$ 2,360.00 |
$ 0.00 |
-$ 2,360.00 |
Developing plan |
$ 0.00 |
$ 0.00 |
$ 0.00 |
$ 0.00 |
$ 0.00 |
$ 320.00 |
$ 0.00 |
-$ 320.00 |
Organizing finances |
$ 0.00 |
$ 0.00 |
$ 0.00 |
$ 0.00 |
$ 0.00 |
$ 840.00 |
$ 0.00 |
-$ 840.00 |
Register with MylondonHome |
$ 0.00 |
$ 0.00 |
$ 0.00 |
$ 0.00 |
$ 0.00 |
$ 320.00 |
$ 0.00 |
-$ 320.00 |
Search for property |
$ 0.00 |
$ 0.00 |
$ 0.00 |
$ 0.00 |
$ 0.00 |
$ 240.00 |
$ 0.00 |
-$ 240.00 |
Viewing apartment in London |
$ 0.00 |
$ 0.00 |
$ 0.00 |
$ 0.00 |
$ 0.00 |
$ 320.00 |
$ 0.00 |
-$ 320.00 |
Putting forward an offer |
$ 0.00 |
$ 0.00 |
$ 0.00 |
$ 0.00 |
$ 0.00 |
$ 320.00 |
$ 0.00 |
-$ 320.00 |
Arranging a solicitor |
$ 0.00 |
$ 0.00 |
$ 0.00 |
$ 0.00 |
$ 0.00 |
$ 3,920.00 |
$ 0.00 |
-$ 3,920.00 |
Valuation survey |
$ 0.00 |
$ 0.00 |
$ 0.00 |
$ 0.00 |
$ 0.00 |
$ 560.00 |
$ 0.00 |
-$ 560.00 |
Property survey |
$ 0.00 |
$ 0.00 |
$ 0.00 |
$ 0.00 |
$ 0.00 |
$ 480.00 |
$ 0.00 |
-$ 480.00 |
RICS condition report |
$ 0.00 |
$ 0.00 |
$ 0.00 |
$ 0.00 |
$ 0.00 |
$ 840.00 |
$ 0.00 |
-$ 840.00 |
RICS homebuyer report |
$ 0.00 |
$ 0.00 |
$ 0.00 |
$ 0.00 |
$ 0.00 |
$ 560.00 |
$ 0.00 |
-$ 560.00 |
Building or structural survey |
$ 0.00 |
$ 0.00 |
$ 0.00 |
$ 0.00 |
$ 0.00 |
$ 840.00 |
$ 0.00 |
-$ 840.00 |
Finalizing an offer |
$ 0.00 |
$ 0.00 |
$ 0.00 |
$ 0.00 |
$ 0.00 |
$ 320.00 |
$ 0.00 |
-$ 320.00 |
Proper communication |
$ 0.00 |
$ 0.00 |
$ 0.00 |
$ 0.00 |
$ 0.00 |
$ 320.00 |
$ 0.00 |
-$ 320.00 |
Finalizing the mortgage |
$ 0.00 |
$ 0.00 |
$ 0.00 |
$ 0.00 |
$ 0.00 |
$ 1,003,600.00 |
$ 0.00 |
-$ 1,003,600.00 |
Offer accepted |
$ 0.00 |
$ 0.00 |
$ 0.00 |
$ 0.00 |
$ 0.00 |
$ 280.00 |
$ 0.00 |
-$ 280.00 |
Conveyancing and searches |
$ 0.00 |
$ 0.00 |
$ 0.00 |
$ 0.00 |
$ 0.00 |
$ 640.00 |
$ 0.00 |
-$ 640.00 |
Exchange of contracts |
$ 0.00 |
$ 0.00 |
$ 0.00 |
$ 0.00 |
$ 0.00 |
$ 280.00 |
$ 0.00 |
-$ 280.00 |
Enquiries on the property |
$ 0.00 |
$ 0.00 |
$ 0.00 |
$ 0.00 |
$ 0.00 |
$ 1,000,640.00 |
$ 0.00 |
-$ 1,000,640.00 |
Exchange of contracts |
$ 0.00 |
$ 0.00 |
$ 0.00 |
$ 0.00 |
$ 0.00 |
$ 640.00 |
$ 0.00 |
-$ 640.00 |
Signing contracts |
$ 0.00 |
$ 0.00 |
$ 0.00 |
$ 0.00 |
$ 0.00 |
$ 320.00 |
$ 0.00 |
-$ 320.00 |
Transfer of funds |
$ 0.00 |
$ 0.00 |
$ 0.00 |
$ 0.00 |
$ 0.00 |
$ 480.00 |
$ 0.00 |
-$ 480.00 |
Setting mutually agreed completion date |
$ 0.00 |
$ 0.00 |
$ 0.00 |
$ 0.00 |
$ 0.00 |
$ 320.00 |
$ 0.00 |
-$ 320.00 |
Closure phase |
$ 0.00 |
$ 0.00 |
$ 0.00 |
$ 0.00 |
$ 0.00 |
$ 41,760.00 |
$ 0.00 |
-$ 41,760.00 |
Remaining money owed |
$ 0.00 |
$ 0.00 |
$ 0.00 |
$ 0.00 |
$ 0.00 |
$ 40,560.00 |
$ 0.00 |
-$ 40,560.00 |
Paying a mortgage account fee |
$ 0.00 |
$ 0.00 |
$ 0.00 |
$ 0.00 |
$ 0.00 |
$ 560.00 |
$ 0.00 |
-$ 560.00 |
Paying solicitor bill |
$ 0.00 |
$ 0.00 |
$ 0.00 |
$ 0.00 |
$ 0.00 |
$ 320.00 |
$ 0.00 |
-$ 320.00 |
Completion |
$ 0.00 |
$ 0.00 |
$ 0.00 |
$ 0.00 |
$ 0.00 |
$ 320.00 |
$ 0.00 |
-$ 320.00 |
Quality Management
Case and Effect approach is considered as one of the tool that is mainly utilized by the project managers in order to improve the project quality. The critical steps that are generally required to be carried out in the project activities helps in defining the cause. It is identified that a fish bone diagram is generally represented for the project “buying a summer apartment in London. The cause and effects of the project is reflected
Issue Progress Report
The report helps in elaborating the progress for buying a summer apartment in London. For this project, four phases are generally undertaken which are initiation, solicitor arrangement phase, finalizing mortgage phase as well as closure phase.
Initiation phase: In this phase, finances are organized and proper initiation for property search started.
Solicitor arrangement phase: In this phase, proper arrangement for the solicitor is made
Mortgage finalize: In this phase, mortgage of the apartment is finalized.
Closure phase: In this phase, money to mortgage account is paid.
Project Risks
The risks that are associated with the project are listed below:
Finding wrong broker: If the broker is not right then the project manager can face financial challenges.
Inappropriate survey: Due to inappropriate survey, the project manager does not get proper idea about the value of the apartment.
Lack of knowledge: Due to lack of knowledge the owner can face lot of challenges including financial issue.
Inappropriate document verification: The documents of the owner are not verified properly and as a result legal issue can arise.
Manage Risks
The risks that are associated with the project can be managed with the help of the steps that are elaborated in the table below:
Risk |
Impact |
Probability |
Mitigation |
Finding wrong broker |
High |
High |
Right broker must be identified. |
Inappropriate survey |
High |
Medium |
Proper survey needs to be conducted in order to resolve the issue. |
Lack of knowledge |
Medium |
Medium |
Proper knowledge about the apartment needs to gained before buying. |
Inappropriate document verification |
High |
High |
All the documents must be properly verified. |
21. Manage Project Change Request
The changes that is needed in the project is that the project manager does not want s to contact a broker and wants to buy the apartment with the help of online procedure so that the challenges that is present in finding the right broker got resolved.
Issue Lesson Learned Report
From this project, it is analyzed that before buying a property we need to gain proper knowledge about it. It is also necessary to undertake the survey properly for getting appropriate information about the value of the property. In addition to this, proper document verification is important for the project.
Issue Project Closure Report
The project manager engages in reviewing the project closure report. | |
Documents |
Roles |
Feasibility report |
To analyze that the project is feasible |
Status report |
To focus on the progress of the project |
Final document |
It reflects that the project is completed successfully. |
Stakeholder’s signoff:
Position |
Signoff (Signatures) |
Project manager |
William Watson |
Broker |
James Anderson |
Organizer |
James Anderson |
Solicitor |
Andrew Lee |
Contractor |
James smith |
Project Planner |
Stephen smith |
Bibliography
Braglia, M., & Frosolini, M. (2014). An integrated approach to implement project management information systems within the extended enterprise. International Journal of Project Management, 32(1), 18-29.
Bucero, A., & Englund, R. L. (2015, October). Project sponsorship: Achieving management commitment for project success. Project Management Institute.
Conforto, E. C., Salum, F., Amaral, D. C., da Silva, S. L., & de Almeida, L. F. M. (2014). Can agile project management be adopted by industries other than software development?. Project Management Journal, 45(3), 21-34.
Costantino, F., Di Gravio, G., & Nonino, F. (2015). Project selection in project portfolio management: An artificial neural network model based on critical success factors. International Journal of Project Management, 33(8), 1744-1754.
Drouin, N., Sankaran, S., & Muller, R. (2016). The nature of organizational project management and its role as an organizational capability. Manageable Cooperation?.
Fleming, Q. W., & Koppelman, J. M. (2016, December). Earned value project management. Project Management Institute.
Hornstein, H. A. (2015). The integration of project management and organizational change management is now a necessity. International Journal of Project Management, 33(2), 291-298.
Joslin, R., & Müller, R. (2015). Relationships between a project management methodology and project success in different project governance contexts. International Journal of Project Management, 33(6), 1377-1392.
Kucharska, W., & Kowalczyk, R. (2016). Trust, collaborative culture and tacit knowledge sharing in project management–A relationship model.
Marcelino-Sádaba, S., Pérez-Ezcurdia, A., Lazcano, A. M. E., & Villanueva, P. (2014). Project risk management methodology for small firms. International journal of project management, 32(2), 327-340.
Mir, F. A., & Pinnington, A. H. (2014). Exploring the value of project management: linking project management performance and project success. International journal of project management, 32(2), 202-217.
Papke-Shields, K. E., & Boyer-Wright, K. M. (2017). Strategic planning characteristics applied to project management. International Journal of Project Management, 35(2), 169-179.
Sánchez, M. A. (2015). Integrating sustainability issues into project management. Journal of Cleaner Production, 96, 319-330.
Svejvig, P., & Andersen, P. (2015). Rethinking project management: A structured literature review with a critical look at the brave new world. International Journal of Project Management, 33(2), 278-290.
Todorovi?, M. L., Petrovi?, D. ?., Mihi?, M. M., Obradovi?, V. L., & Bushuyev, S. D. (2015). Project success analysis framework: A knowledge-based approach in project management. International Journal of Project Management, 33(4), 772-783.
Too, E. G., & Weaver, P. (2014). The management of project management: A conceptual framework for project governance. International Journal of Project Management, 32(8), 1382-1394.
Buy Mba 530 Managing Strategic Business Assessment Answers Online
Talk to our expert to get the help with Mba 530 Managing Strategic Business Assessment Answers to complete your assessment on time and boost your grades now
The main aim/motive of the management assignment help services is to get connect with a greater number of students, and effectively help, and support them in getting completing their assignments the students also get find this a wonderful opportunity where they could effectively learn more about their topics, as the experts also have the best team members with them in which all the members effectively support each other to get complete their diploma assignments. They complete the assessments of the students in an appropriate manner and deliver them back to the students before the due date of the assignment so that the students could timely submit this, and can score higher marks. The experts of the assignment help services at urgenthomework.com are so much skilled, capable, talented, and experienced in their field of programming homework help writing assignments, so, for this, they can effectively write the best economics assignment help services.