MAN6925 Project Management: Compare the PMBOK and Agile PM

mplementing the various technologies been used for making the software engineering more flexible and efficient. It can be expressed as the ‘Umbrella’ term which is been used for the identification of the various models for the development of the Agile. Agile project management has the specialized area in the Project management (Rose, 2013). Many software industries have started adopting the use of the agile in the developing of the products and services being used for highly collaborating with the more efficient nature and the use of methodologies (Larson & Gray, 2013). Various methods and approaches been applied on this technology for the developing methods of the project which were on the Agile principles. Various variants of the agile methods are:

1. Extreme Programming- It is an Agile Software engineering methodology. It is also known as the Extreme XP methodology, which is mainly used for producing the software’s within an appropriate environment. It permits to provide the greater flexibility for the modelling process. The main aim of the project is to have the lower cost which mainly used for lowering the cost used for requiring the software’s. It is the most common model been used for modelling the cost of changing the requirements and later the project can vary to the different fields (Conforto et al., 2014). The main advantage of the Extreme Programming methodology is

• This methodology mainly emphasis on the involvement made by the customer.
• It mainly helps in establishing to the rational plans and the schedules been fixed for achieving the bigger advantage

The following principles of the extreme programming are:

• Simple way of designing
• Acceptance to the customer tests
• Programming is done in the pair
• Process is made on the Continuous Integration
• Development in the Test Driven (Nicholas & Steyn, 2017).
• There are specific codes for the standards.

2. Dynamic Section Development Model- It can be expressed as the software development methodology which is initially based on the rapid way of implementing the application and developing of this methodology. It is the model which is been used for the iteration process and incrementing the approach that mainly emphasize on the continuous user involvement. This methodology has the main aim for delivering the software systems on the time and to the budget. It mainly works on the philosophy that mainly tells about nothing have been developed properly and perfectly in the first attempt and it is been considered as the ever changing in the process (Layton & Ostermiller., 2017). The main advantages of this model is:

• In this model, the users are greatly participating in the development of the systems, so they mainly have the intention to have a grip based on the software development.
• This model provides the facility of delivering the basic functionality for delivering the projects quickly and the major functionalities being delivered at the frequent intervals of time.
• It provides the easy way of accessibility by the developers to the end-users (Schwalbe, 2015).

The following principles of Dynamic Section Development Model are:

• It has the following rules based on the MoSCow are:

M- It must fulfil all the requirements

S- It should have all the possibilities

C- It should not face any critical situations

W- The time is not given but later it is considered.

3. Crystal Methods- This method is actually the grouping of the existing development of the approaches. It helps in to primarily based projects to adjust them separately. It has the involvement with the every project by applying the various set of policies and conventions. The advantage of the following approach are:

• It is based on the people centred method.
• It mainly focuses on dividing the work incrementing the steps.

The following principles of Crystal are:

• Promotes the early and the frequent delivery of working software.
• Adaptability
• High user performance

4. Feature Driven Development- It is been used and processed for designing the iterative software to have the usability in the team and working on the object oriented technologies. It is used for transitioning form the face based approach to an iterative approach. Advantages of this process are:

• It helps in to move the bigger size of project s and to achieve the success.
• It has the five processes which mainly help in to bring the work done in the shortest time (Dybå et al., 2014).

It has the basic features and principles:

• Featuring in the team
• Inspections is made
• Configuration management
• Visibility in the progress and to the results.
• Development is made according to the features.

5. Scrum Development Methodology-It is used for applying to the nearly technology. It is been process for the suitability of the appropriate projects that are rapidly changing on the high amount of the emerging requirements. This is been used for beginning to the reviews and ending up with the final conclusion of the final review (Boutros & Cardella, 2016). The technology has best used for speeding the development of the software which mainly include the iterations for developing the software. Advantages are:

• It helps in making the decisions entirely to the teams
• It enables the methodologies where the requirements and the documentation is not considered significantly.

The following principles of the Scrum are:

• It is based on the Product Owner.
• Functionality in the Product Backlog.
• Estimation on the Cross Functional Teams.
• Signing up to the delivery of the potentially shippable increments (Fernandez & Fernandez, 2008).

6. Lean Development Methodology- This process is been used for focusing on the creation of the easy way of changeable software’s. This methodology has been strategically used for developing and focusing on the agile methodology. The main objective and the goal have been set up for developing the software in half of the time period with the minimal amount and the less budget for the required workflow (Kerzner, 2013). The main advantages of this methodology is:

• Earliest elimination is been made for the overall efficiency of developing the process for the certain help needed to speed up the process for the entire development of the software.
• The product is been delivered at early stage for the definite advantage (Hoda & Murugesan, 2016).

The following principles of the Lean Methodology are:

• Eliminating of the waste
• Amplification in the learning process
• Building the Integrity
• Empowering the team
• Delivering the project as fast as possible.

Contrasts Methods

Essentially, agile project management is better and appropriate for the volatile and developing the innovative projects for the development of the software’s. In terms of the contrasts methods various approaches is being used for the comparison in the agile project management. There are various approaches. There are various methods which are being used for the various methods that are been taken. There are several differences between the various approaches depending upon the sizes of the projects (Špundak, 2014).  The software development is used for making the differences in the following that is, to state the principles and the values stated in the Agile Manifesto for receiving the attention in the project management. Various Differences between the approaches applied in the agile project management are:

Applicability- Nature of Projects and the methods used for the clear identification

The nature of the product is based on the various applications being used in the current scenario for the identification and having the various methodologies and strategies used for the bigger success in the project management. The Agile team are more expertise and skilled for the overall completion of the project. The application is being used for processing the agile technology and the tools used for the main roles and the technologies and the techniques being used for emerging with the agile methodologies and the techniques with the higher involvement in building the decisions. There are various applications in the field are:

1. Feasible studies or projects/ Pre-feasibility
2. Maintenance, repairing of implementing the projects and jobbing (Schwaber & Beedle, 2002).

Comparison between Agile Project Management and PMBOK

Conclusion 

In the world of business where the competition is continually growing at the faster speed and time to the market is also shrinking at the higher rate Agile Project Management have been expanded to the business world locally and globally for emerging into the multiple technologies. This methodology addresses the needs of the present business situations. The technology is been implemented for emerging into the large business services by providing the various facilities like higher level of the quality of the product, performance and control which is been set up to satisfy the customer. The technology is been implemented for the development process which as the main aim of achieving the customer satisfaction more than the traditional methods used in the present and the future scenario.

References

Abrahamsson, P., Salo, O., Ronkainen, J., & Warsta, J. (2017). Agile software development methods: Review and analysis. arXiv preprint arXiv:1709.08439.

Boutros, T., & Cardella, J. (2016). Agile Project Management. Routledge.

C, M. C., & Ostermiller, S. J. (2017). Agile project management for dummies. John Wiley & Sons.

Conforto, E. C., Salum, F., Amaral, D. C., da Silva, S. L., & de Almeida, L. F. M. (2014). Can agile project management be adopted by industries other than software development?. Project Management Journal, 45(3), 21-34.

Dybå, T., Dingsøyr, T., & Moe, N. B. (2014). Agile project management. In Software project management in a changing world (pp. 277-300). Springer Berlin Heidelberg..

Fernandez, D. J., & Fernandez, J. D. (2008). Agile project management—agilism versus traditional approaches. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 49(2), 10-17.

Highsmith, J. (2009). Agile project management: creating innovative products. Pearson Education.

Hoda, R., & Murugesan, L. K. (2016). Multi-level agile project management challenges: A self-organizing team perspective. Journal of Systems and Software, 117, 245-257.

Kerzner, H. (2013). Project management: a systems approach to planning, scheduling, and controlling. John Wiley & Sons.

Larson, E. W., & Gray, C. (2013). Project Management: The Managerial Process with MS Project. McGraw-Hill.

Nicholas, J. M., & Steyn, H. (2017). Project management for engineering, business and technology. Taylor & Francis.

Rose, K. H. (2013). A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide)—Fifth Edition. Project management journal, 44(3).

Schwaber, K., & Beedle, M. (2002). Agile software development with Scrum (Vol. 1). Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.

Schwalbe, K. (2015). Information technology project management. Cengage Learning.

Snyder, C. S. (2014). A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge: PMBOK (®) Guide. Project Management Institute.

Špundak, M. (2014). Mixed agile/traditional project management methodology–reality or illusion?. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 119, 939-948.