Law 2513 Human Rights - Assessment Answers

1) The reasons behind the Darfur Crisis
2) What are the human rights been violated?
3) Mention the role of the NGOs in this crisis
4) Report of the outcome of the conflict

Human Rights

1. The Darfur war broke out in February 2003. The rebellious group, which comprised the marginalized segment of Sudanese officially took up arms to claim the same political and social rights as the other provinces of Sudan at the moment when the prospect of a peace agreement in the conflict was emerging (Farrow and Rebecca 37). A closer look at the history and context of crisis shows that the problem is not only ethnic but also economic (Hassan and Carina 13). People who claim that the Darfur crisis comes from an ethnic or religious problem do not have a very good knowledge of this region. This war is actually economic. The colonial powers of yesterday and the imperialist powers of today are responsible for the misfortunes of Africa. This whole region, from Sudan to Senegal, shared the same cultural origins in the past and was rich in wealth. It could have been united and developed if colonialism in the 19th century had not come to create dummy boundaries within that area. I say that these borders are factitious because they were created according to the balance of power between the colonial powers, without considering the reality on the ground and even less the desires of the African people. Great Britain applied the "divide and conquer" policy (Bassil 71). Sudan was divided into two parts: in the North, Arabic was kept as an official language and Islam was maintained; in the South, however, English was imposed and missionaries converted the population to Protestantism. No exchange was to be made between the two newly created regions. The British even brought Greek and Armenian minorities to create a buffer zone between North and South! By the choice of the British, Khartoum became a very dynamic city economically and a central bourgeoisie emerged (Vaughan 93). The division of Britain between North and South and the choice of Khartoum as the center of colonial activity will have a disastrous impact on the history of Sudan.

2. According to testimonies received by several humanitarian organizations, villages were bombed by the Sudanese air force, these attacks being followed by ground intervention by pro-government Arab militias and / or Sudanese army soldiers who multiple abuses: murders, rapes, looting, destruction of houses or entire villages, destruction of water points, fire of crops and food reserves, theft of livestock. The actions of the militias are clearly aimed at causing population displacements by making life impossible in the areas concerned.

3. NGOs played a humanitarian role during crisis. They contributed to the provision of clean water, sanitation, food security and the management of internally displaced persons. They also facilitate rehabilitation, distribution of school materials, sensitization sessions on hygiene practices as well as the construction of latrines and the installation of rainwater collection tanks. For example, Solidarités conducts a program of drilling and rehabilitation of water pumps and wells in South Darfur, and distributes basic necessities in two separate zones, one in Niertiti, under government control, the other in Muhajaria, in rebel zone (MLS). Doctors of the World France (MDM) was in charge of implementing a medical and nutritional action program in the Kalma IDP camp. Action Against Hunger (ACF) was in charge of running nutrition and health centers and a food security program (Clarke 33). It is also envisaged that NGOs assisted in extracting and obtaining crucial information and relaying it to the relevant international groups for appropriate intervention. That is why most of them were closed by Sudanese government because the However, most of the NGOs have been accused for collaborating with ICC.

4. The Darfur crisis resulted in many undesirable outcomes. First, it resulted in massive displacement of people. Nearly 1 million displaced people fled their homes to seek refuge elsewhere in Sudan. In addition, more than 100,000 people fled to neighboring Chad (De 67). Secondly, it deprived most of the Sudanese of their freedom to engage in their day to day economic activities. It should be noted that the people affected in crisis comprises mainly the farmers. Unable to cultivate their land, the harvest could not be made and this resulted in famine. In addition, the crisis leads to paralysis of virtually all institutions. The crisis also affected the neighboring nations such as eastern Chad, due to the continuation of incursions of Khartoum-backed rebels and the proliferation of inter-ethnic violence. The north-eastern Central African Republic (CAR) also experienced persistent volatility, fueled by events in neighboring Darfur and Chad.

Works Cited

De, Waal A. War in Darfur and the Search for Peace. Cambridge, MA: Global Equity Initiative, Harvard University, 2007. Print.

Hassan, Salah M, and Carina E. Ray. Darfur and the Crisis of Governance in Sudan: A Critical Reader. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2009. Print.

Farrow, Mia, and Rebecca Hamilton. Fighting for Darfur: Public Action and the Struggle to Stop Genocide. New York: St. Martin's Press, 2014. Internet resource.

Bassil, Noah R. The Post-Colonial State and Civil War in Sudan: The Origins of Conflict in Darfur. London: I.B. Tauris, 2012. Print.

Vaughan, Christopher. Darfur: Colonial Violence, Sultanic Legacies and Local Politics, 1916-1956. , 2015. Print.

Clarke, Matthew. Aid in Conflict. New York: Nova Science Publishers, 2006. Print.