ITC505 Assignment 3

• Determine the timeframe for achieving the MOV –

• SUMMARISE THE MOV IN A CLEAR CONCISE STATEMENT OR TABLE

The MOV analysis is being done for developing an effective project management output with the development of the mobile application for easing the works and managing the composition of the works. The influence of the project management tools would help in achievement of the application required for the Stud Farm for managing their works.

Part Two:
Define Scope and produce a Scope Management Plan

Define the scope

The Scope statement is being done for developing an effective project management output with the development of the mobile application for easing the works and managing the composition of the works. The influence of the project management tools would help in achievement of the application required for the Stud Farm for managing their works.

Requirements:

• Management of the Information
• Integrated Database
• Smart and Easy UI for the application
• Improvement of the works by the Farmers

In scope-out scope items: The in scope items of the project include Charter Documentation, PID development, Complete Plan Development, Designing UI, Designing application functions, Designing Features, Alpha Testing, Beta Testing, Test Documents, Monitoring Plan, Final Documentation, and Implementation of plan. The change management and transport requirements are out of scope items of the project.

Deliverables:

Acceptance Criteria:

The achievement of the following deliverables and milestones for each of the phase in the estimated time and budget would be the acceptance criteria,

Provide a list of Resources

Part Three:

Task List

Gantt Chart

WBS List

WBS

Part Four:

Project Risk Analysis and Plan

Part Five:

Quality Management Plan. It should include:
• A short statement that reflects your team’s philosophy or objective for ensuring that you deliver a quality system to your client.

The scope of the project explains that All work would be completed in time, Quality factors would assist in work, and Scope of the project would help in alignment
• Develop and describe the following that your project team could implement to ensure quality;

• A set of verification activities: Testing methods like alpha testing, beta testing, and simulation
• A set of validation activities: Affective work function management for aligning innovative work function

Part Six:

1. To prepare for this task, you will be required to provide an annotated bibliography.

According to Kerzner and Kerzner (2017), the task under centre concerns the structure, improvement, just as usage of progress the board activity to change the organization's quality administration framework from that of heritage procedures to Six Sigma consistent on at the hierarchical dimension. This task was conceptualized and started to address the organization's proceeded with cost wasteful aspects, quality deformities, and consumer loyalty. The organization is embraced the undertaking inside with an exceptional work bunch doled out as the task supervisory group containing a venture director and a group of three individuals answering to the venture chief.

The study of Fleming and Koppelman (2016) proves that the scope the executives inside any undertaking speaks to the key part concerning task arranging and the equivalent basically portrays the manners by which scope will get characterized, reasonably created, and viably checked/controlled/approved. The different procedures inside degree arranging involve the handled to setting up the announcement of the undertaking extension, forms which will empower in general advancement of nitty gritty WBS by method for degree articulation settled, process which will set up the manners by which scope gauge will be affirmed just as kept up, lastly process which will determine the manners by which there will be formal acknowledgment concerning how the task expectations that are finished will be gotten.

Larson and Gray (2017), have pointed out that the task will involve structure, advancement, just as execution of progress the executives activity to change the organization's quality administration framework from that of heritage procedures to Six Sigma agreeable on at the authoritative dimension and the venture results will make the inside procedures to be cost proficient, improve imperfection rates, and upgrade consumer loyalty.

1. Develop a closure checklist that the project team will use to ensure that the project has been closed properly.
2. Develop a project evaluation –outline and discuss how your project’s MOV will be evaluated.

• All work would be completed in time
• Quality factors would assist in work
• Scope of the project would help in alignment

Conclusion

The developed assignment was a project charter document defined for integrating the formation of the specific and effective alignment of the information. The project of developing the online mobile application for Stud Farm was formed for aligning and integrating the management of the works. The document had highlight the scope, risk, timeline, budget, and other elements of project management for easing the works and aligning it effectively. The documentation had allow the effective management of the works for listing the progress management. The major factors for defining the works of application development includes the designing and development principles. The integration had also ensure the management of the works for enduring the effective identification of the works. The mobile application had been marked with the considerate alignment of the processes.

Referencing of sources

Fleming, Q. W., and Koppelman, J. M. 2016, December. Earned value project management. Project Management Institute.

Grissom, J. A., Loeb, S., and Mitani, H. 2015. Principal time management skills: Explaining patterns in principals’ time use, job stress, and perceived effectiveness. Journal of Educational Administration, 53(6), 773-793.

Harrison, F. and Lock, D., 2017. Advanced project management: a structured approach. Routledge.

Heagney, J. 2016. Fundamentals of project management. Amacom.

Heldman, K., 2018. PMP: project management professional exam study guide. John Wiley & Sons.

Joslin, R., and Müller, R. 2015. Relationships between a project management methodology and project success in different project governance contexts. International Journal of Project Management, 33(6), 1377-1392.

Kerzner, H. and Kerzner, H.R., 2017. Project management: a systems approach to planning, scheduling, and controlling. John Wiley & Sons.

Kerzner, H., 2019. Using the project management maturity model: strategic planning for project management. Wiley.

Larson, E.W. and Gray, C.F., 2017. Project management: The managerial process. McGraw-Hill Education.

Livesey, S., and Crane, A. 2017. Are You Talking to Me?: Stakeholder communication and the risks and rewards of dialogue. In Unfolding Stakeholder Thinking 2 (pp. 39-52). Routledge.

Morden, T. 2017. Principles of management. Routledge.

Oettingen, G., Kappes, H. B., Guttenberg, K. B., and Gollwitzer, P. M. 2015. Self‐regulation of time management: Mental contrasting with implementation intentions. European Journal of Social Psychology, 45(2), 218-229.

Schwalbe, K. 2015. Information technology project management. Cengage Learning.

Serrador, P., and Turner, R. 2015. The relationship between project success and project efficiency. Project Management Journal, 46(1), 30-39.

Verzuh, E., 2015. The fast forward MBA in project management. John Wiley & Sons.