G550 Cyber Security : Humans Interacting Over Control Systems
You are expected to demonstrate an insight into the implications of the problem introduced in each task by using clear and concise arguments. The reports should be well written (and word-processed), showing good skills in creativity and design. Sentences should be of an appropriate length and the writing style should be brief but informative.
Answer:
Introduction:
The cyber warfare has been involving the activities by the national or international organizations for attacking and attempting to harm the computers or the information networks of other nations. For instance, this includes the DoS or Denial of Services or the Computer Viruses.
The following report involves the fog of war and the information environmental decision. It also analyzes the decision making for the cyber war along with the critical discussions.
Discussion on Fog of War:
The world is facing a war in the cyber world known as the Fog of War. Some of them have been a quibble. They have been possessing malicious hacking as the warfare. There has been the preference of phases like the “cyber conflict” or “cyber espionage” (Kott, Swami and West 2016). The individuals, industries, and governments have been meeting constant attacks throughout the world. The marauders using the Internet for stealing the important information, sabotage critical operations and the recruiting terrorists has been denoting the war. This has been the high time for the reactions coordinated internationally (Rantapelkonen and Salminen 2013).
The cyber conflict has been now referred to as the fifth domain of war. This is the conceptual framework that has been not totally accurate but helpful enough. The military has been looking for paths for integrating the cyber strategies in the operational framework. The effort has been fraught with the complexities since there has been the real “Fog of War” in the planning of cyber operations (Zaitsev et al. 2017). Moreover, it has been not possible to conceive what cyber operation is to be run since there has been no clear understanding supplying the intellectual background for those operations.
Information environment discussion:
The information has been providing the lens to analyze the development and the impacts of cyber-attack. It has been supplying the high situational understandings and helping to make better decisions. This has been without any plan and operating processes to gather and leverage numerous data points (Applegate 2015). Thus it turned out to be impossible for navigating effectively.
One of the popular threats involved is the targeted countermeasures that are planned and deployed for the primary threats recognized via threat modeling. Next, there is the hunting that could be fought with the focused and intelligence-led investigation regarding the malicious activities. This is done by the adversaries over the network and endpoints of the organizations. These could be determined by the automated tools of security. Then there is the coercion and trapping (Forsyth Jr and Pope 2015). Here the endpoint and network conditions are changed for provoking the secret advisory for engaging in the malicious activities. Then there are the deception technologies creating vulnerabilities and fake systems for attracting the advisory, stalling and disrupting the progression of the attack.
Decision making for cyber:
The MADM or the multiple attribute decision-making approaches have been much important in the cyber warfare. This is helpful where limited alternatives are present. The decision maker needs to select the most effective opportunity. The MADM issues are categorized as the compromising methods, concordance methods and the scoring methods (Cappella, Kim and Albarracín 2015).
The cyber-attacks have been more vulnerable in the short conflicts limited to scope and time. The hazards generated by the attacks in the logistics and services have been delivering the initial benefits. However, the longer the conflict has been going, the possible increase that the usage of the benefit declines. Thus the cyber attacks have been introducing a new domain to generate the large part of the “Fog and Friction of the War” (Burnap and Williams 2015). It has been slowing down the decision making and increasing the caution and raising the chances of errors. The misleading of the opposing commanders are been always the part of the warfare. However, cyber-attacks have been providing the newest and more intimate ability to undergo that (Håkansson and Hartung 2014). Thus it has been potentially offering the vital benefits for deception and undermining confidence.
Critical discussion supporting the above case:
Carl von Clausewitz coined the term the “Fog of War”. Here the fog was used as the metaphor for the ambiguities of war. As the war starts, the information tactically relevant turns out to be confusing and distorted. Due to the complexities to see the patterns in the middle of the fog, the tactical leaders should be permitted to independently act on the operational plans. Thus to prepare for battle plans are always useless and the planning has been indispensable.
It is friction that accounts for the difference between how long things are expected to take “on paper” and the actual time that elapses due to unexpected distractions. As an example, one can plan for a group of people to walk information from point to point in an hour, but if sixty people each stop separately for a minute to tie a shoelace, holding up the line behind them, the last person in line will arrive an hour late because of the accumulation of delay. Unexpected events invariably cause friction that delays or sets a group of course.
The decision makers, on the other hand, need to develop and perform effectively economically for pleasing the shareholders or investors. They need to continue innovation and keep generating latest products. They must also build new services for satisfying the needs of the customers. Further, they need to avoid risks regarding the investment in the communities they have been active in. They must be careful about the risks of the bad impacts on the environment. Also, they need to check the risks regarding the interruption of the ongoing business by the security incidents and cyber attacks.
Conclusion:
Though the fog of war has been shrouding the vision and clouding the judgment, the lessons help in minimizing the results of the inevitable mistakes. The constraint management has been the matter to find sources of the friction and then streamlining the throughputs. The basic motivating value of the decision maker has been the achieving the optimal or the acceptable results in the outside world. Then the central attitudinal focus of the decision maker must be seeking the acceptable or the optimal resolution within the given constraints.
References:
Applegate, S., 2015. Cyber Conflict: Disruption and Exploitation in the Digital Age. In Current and Emerging Trends in Cyber Operations (pp. 19-36). Palgrave Macmillan UK.
Backhaus, S., Bent, R., Bono, J., Lee, R., Tracey, B., Wolpert, D., Xie, D. and Yildiz, Y., 2013. Cyber-physical security: A game theory model of humans interacting over control systems. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 4(4), pp.2320-2327.
Bhuiyan, M.Z.A., Wu, J., Wang, G. and Cao, J., 2016. Sensing and Decision Making in Cyber-Physical Systems: The Case of Structural Event Monitoring. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 12(6), pp.2103-2114.
Burnap, P. and Williams, M.L., 2015. Cyber hate speech on twitter: An application of machine classification and statistical modeling for policy and decision making. Policy & Internet, 7(2), pp.223-242.
Cappella, J.N., Kim, H.S. and Albarracín, D., 2015. Selection and transmission processes for information in the emerging media environment: Psychological motives and message characteristics. Media psychology, 18(3), pp.396-424.
Cavelty, M.D., 2014. Breaking the cyber-security dilemma: Aligning security needs and removing vulnerabilities. Science and Engineering Ethics, 20(3), pp.701-715.
Forsyth Jr, J.W. and Pope, B.E., 2015. Structural Causes and Cyber Effects: A Response to Our Critics. AIR UNIV MAXWELL AFB AL AIR FORCE RESEARCH INST.
Håkansson, A. and Hartung, R., 2014. An infrastructure for individualised and intelligent decision-making and negotiation in cyber-physical systems. Procedia Computer Science, 35, pp.822-831.
Hanratty, T.P., Newcomb, E.A., Hammell II, R.J., Richardson, J.T. and Mittrick, M.R., 2016. A fuzzy-based approach to support decision making in complex military environments. International Journal of Intelligent Information Technologies (IJIIT), 12(1), pp.1-30.
Jones, A., Vidalis, S. and Abouzakhar, N., 2016, September. Information security and digital forensics in the world of cyber physical systems. In Digital Information Management (ICDIM), 2016 Eleventh International Conference on (pp. 10-14). IEEE.
Kott, A., Swami, A. and West, B.J., 2016. The Fog of War in Cyberspace. Computer, 49(11), pp.84-87.
Kott, A., Swami, A. and West, B.J., 2016. Army Science Planning and Strategy Meeting: The Fog of Cyber War (No. ARL-TR-7902). US Army Research Laboratory Adelphi United States.
Lee, J., Kao, H.A. and Yang, S., 2014. Service innovation and smart analytics for industry 4.0 and big data environment. Procedia Cirp, 16, pp.3-8.
Lee, J., Lapira, E., Bagheri, B. and Kao, H.A., 2013. Recent advances and trends in predictive manufacturing systems in big data environment. Manufacturing Letters, 1(1), pp.38-41.
Orend, B., 2014. Fog in the fifth dimension: The ethics of cyber-war. In The ethics of information warfare (pp. 3-23). Springer International Publishing.
Rantapelkonen, J. and Salminen, M., 2013. The fog of cyber defence. Julkaisusarja 2. Artikkelikokoelma n: o 10.
Shin, J.H., Cheon, S.P. and Eom, J.H., 2014. The Role and Responsibility of Cyber Intelligence in Cyber Warfare. In The proceedings of The 3rd International Conference on Information Technology and Computer Science, ASTL (Vol. 51, pp. 305-308).
Von Solms, R. and Van Niekerk, J., 2013. From information security to cyber security. computers & security, 38, pp.97-102.
Wang, W. and Lu, Z., 2013. Cyber security in the Smart Grid: Survey and challenges. Computer Networks, 57(5), pp.1344-1371.
Zaitsev, A.V., Gostev, S.S., Cherkashin, P.A. and Shcherbakov, A.Y., 2017. Regarding the technology of distributed storage of confidential information in centers of general-purpose data processing. Automatic Documentation and Mathematical Linguistics, 51(3), pp.117-119.
Buy G550 Cyber Security : Humans Interacting Over Control Systems Answers Online
Talk to our expert to get the help with G550 Cyber Security : Humans Interacting Over Control Systems Answers to complete your assessment on time and boost your grades now
The main aim/motive of the management assignment help services is to get connect with a greater number of students, and effectively help, and support them in getting completing their assignments the students also get find this a wonderful opportunity where they could effectively learn more about their topics, as the experts also have the best team members with them in which all the members effectively support each other to get complete their diploma assignments. They complete the assessments of the students in an appropriate manner and deliver them back to the students before the due date of the assignment so that the students could timely submit this, and can score higher marks. The experts of the assignment help services at urgenthomework.com are so much skilled, capable, talented, and experienced in their field of programming homework help writing assignments, so, for this, they can effectively write the best economics assignment help services.
