Environment Management : Varying Proportions

The several ways can be changes in scientific community interventions that can guide and inform citizens about the damage from time to time.

Let us look at each of these mitigation efforts one at a time. The community must identify its efforts that lead to a generation of nonlinearities and a complete threshold of responses in the complete ecosystem that can lead to changes. They must strive to move in a faster way to decide and decipher the changes in environmental diversity.

The next idea is around awareness and spreading the word that changes in biodiversity also impacts the environment in a large number of ways. The scientific community and the proactive citizens must convey the message to policy makers, public servants and also the public since there are a lot of public awareness issues that have been faced. These changes thus become not responsive to mitigation once they have occurred.

Then comes the role of private companies and land managers who must consider the ecological and social consequences of having biodiversity changes. This impacts land-use planning and integration. There will be consequences of having loss in nonlinear future changes as well as support to managed landscapes that can support regional biodiversity and implementation of policies in that regard. There have to management and adaptive process integration in this phase. There should be a strong collaboration of scientific community and government organizations. The community must identify its efforts that lead to a generation of nonlinearities and a complete threshold of responses in the complete ecosystem that can lead to changes. They must strive to move in a faster way to decide and decipher the changes in environmental diversity.

The community must identify its efforts that lead to a generation of nonlinearities and a complete threshold of responses in the complete ecosystem that can lead to changes. The collaboration must be from local and national levels and must ensure that changes in policies are made according to the changes in biodiversity. There should be restrictions on the export and import of biotic materials that damage DNA of species and alter it in certain ways. Improved land and watershed management can also come into picture. This impacts land-use planning and integration. There are also evidences of changes in specific traits as a direct consequence of such changes.

Apart from this the new IPCC committee has been conceived and this has led to collaborations between all the governments and the scientific community. Thus the changes in biodiversity and its consequence on the integral component of the assessment of societal impact of climate change needs to be monitored. The international bodies need to establish and implement the advances in conventional norms of biodiversity has led to reduction in these activities. These activities include fossil fuel emissions and land-use changes with biological introductions.

Why are these systems, process, mechanisms or structures in place? Is it due to population growth? Why has the population grown? What draws people to a single location that requires such engineering solutions? Will growth continue and what can the systems, process, mechanisms or structures handle the load?

These systems and processes have been in place to stop the trigger to the seventh major extinction event in the history of wildlife and ecology. The sixth major extinction event has already got triggered. The history of life suggests that there is a global change in the distribution of organisms. These changes in biodiversity and alteration of in the resilience of ecosystem can lead to damage in environmental changes (Glasson, Therivel and Chadwick 2013). There are fatal consequences of having the services that have driven the ecosystems to such degrading levels. These large ecosystems have led to minimization of changes in future solutions to global issues and environmental problems (Hernandez and Allen 2014).

Human beings have altered the global environment extensively, there have been several changes in the biogeochemical cycles and land transformation. There have also been changes in the ways of having the enhancements in mobility of data and land transformation. Apart from this fossil fuel combustion issues there have also been issues with deforestation and increased CO2 in the atmosphere the increase has reached as alarming levels as a 30% increase in the past four centuries. The concentration of methane has also doubled and this has contributed to climate warming (Azcue 2012). These greenhouse gases will cause significant climate changes across the globe in the coming centuries this will lead to extinction of even greater number of species and would take longer than usual for the same. Next comes the trouble in land due to nitrogen fixation and other human activities. There have been several changes that have led to mass extinction in ecological coastal areas.

Describe how these systems, process, mechanisms or structures have changed since their inception. How has advances in technology, science and engineering allowed them to change and evolve.

In order to answer this question let us look at the 1992 UN framework convention for climate change which is termed as UNFCCC. As per UNFCCC the climate change is due to alteration in the global atmosphere as a consequence of human activity interventions (Westhoek and Oenema 2014). But when we look at the definitions of the IPCC which is the intergovernmental panel on climate change we can see that there are several references to land use change and impact on bio diversity (Blaikie and Wisner 2014).

In their own words, “climate change refers to a statistically significant variation in either the mean state of the climate or in its variability... Climate change may be due to natural internal processes or external forcing, or to persistent anthropogenic changes in the composition of the atmosphere or in land use” (IPCC, 2001).

Thus the scientific impact of global average temperatures and both sea and surface temperature variations can be seen. They have studied the impact on local and global events, they have also studied the importance of frequency and intensity of operations (Ditchkoff and Gibson 2012). We can also look at the changes in the soil moisture and above- and below-ground biomass levels. The local precipitation data is also studied. There are fatal consequences of having the services that have driven the ecosystems to such degrading levels. These large ecosystems have led to minimization of changes in future solutions to global issues and environmental problems. These changes in biodiversity and alteration of in the resilience of ecosystem can lead to damage in environmental changes. There has to be a clear cut effect of having a security match-up to ensure the better parts of the environmental system does not crack down. This will lead to a better investment of the resources that will lead to a better security from corporate lapses (Smith 2013).

As per the latest protocol which is the Kyoto Protocol there have been several discussions on restrictive anthropogenic carbon dioxide and corresponding discharges of the other potential greenhouse gases. Thus this concentration of greenhouse gases needs to be reduced further in order to ensure better operability of the land resources (Lindenmayer and Fischer 2013). The other issue is to look at the security issues faced by the private companies while they make environmental deals. There are several companies that are most particular about environmental security. There are several information security class action suits that are filed when there is a breach. The amount runs into tens of thousands of dollars. These factors have led to changes in biodiversity in varying proportions. These changes in turn lead to a lot of changes in vulnerability to species invasions (McMichael 2013).

Does legislation exist around your chosen environmental impact that ensures mitigation measure are in place to control the outcomes?

We can see that there are several regulations as we already discussed some of these. There are governmental and international bodies that have been set up primarily to regulate the environmental cycles and such behaviors. There have to complete environmental solidarity for such effectiveness. There also needs to be strong impetus on local level legislation to ensure there is energy security and minimized damage to environment.

The world is at the cross roads right now. We all know that the Earth has becomes an experimental field and one of the largest one in the history of mankind. There have been human effects on every phase of activity, biogeochemical cycles and land use regulations. There have be stringent regulations in this phase. The planets ecosystem is facing a huge shift in the way the altered bio diversity can impact us. We can see it in the food chain itself for instance. Thus this concentration of greenhouse gases needs to be reduced further in order to ensure better operability of the land resources. There have to be species introductions for the same. In the past Montreal Protocol prohibited the release of chlorofluorocarbons/ CFCs with response from scientific evidence suggesting that these chemicals have led to loss of ozone and increased the level of cancer producing radiations like UV-B (Dullinger and Pergl 2013). There are strong evidence of changes in the way biodiversity has manifested in the economy. Thus there needs to a blueprint for common action by communities’ and governments. Then comes the role of private companies and land managers who must consider the ecological and social consequences of having biodiversity changes. The business landscape needs the strict guidance of the legal organization since the organizations have to act responsibly with respect to the environment and thus require safety of information as the most important thing for survival.

References

Ditchkoff, S.S. and Gibson, C.J., 2012. Animal behavior in urban ecosystems: modifications due to human-induced stress. Urban Ecosystems, 9(1), pp.5-12.

Westhoek, H.and Oenema, O., 2014. Food choices, health and environment: effects of cutting Europe's meat and dairy intake. Global Environmental Change, 26, pp.196-205.

Glasson, J., Therivel, R. and Chadwick, A., 2013. Introduction to environmental impact assessment. Routledge.

Dullinger, S.and Pergl, J., 2013. Europe’s other debt crisis caused by the long legacy of future extinctions.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110(18), pp.7342-7347

McMichael, A.J., 2013. Globalization, climate change, and human health.New England Journal of Medicine, 368(14), pp.1335-1343.

Smith, K., 2013. Environmental hazards: assessing risk and reducing disaster. Routledge.

Lindenmayer, D.B. and Fischer, J., 2013. Habitat fragmentation and landscape change: an ecological and conservation synthesis. Island Press.

Blaikie, P. and Wisner, B., 2014. At risk: natural hazards, people's vulnerability and disasters. Routledge.

Hernandez, R.R. and Allen, M.F., 2014. Environmental impacts of utility-scale solar energy. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 29, pp.766-779.

Azcue, J.M. ed., 2012. Environmental impacts of mining activities: emphasis on mitigation and remedial measures. Springer Science & Business Media.