Eco3Itr International Trade And The Assessment Answers
Questions:
Question 1
Suppose an hour’s labour produces 10 kg of rice and 5 meter of cloth in India, and 5 kg and 2 meter in Thailand. Using opportunity costs, explain which country will export cloth and which will export rice in trade?
Question 2
Suppose Mike and Johnson produce two products-hamburgers and T-shirts. Mike produces 10 hamburgers or 3 T-shirts a day and Johnson produces 7 hamburgers or 4 T-shirts. Assuming they can devote time in making either hamburgers or T-shirts
- Draw the production possibility curve
- Who enjoys the absolute advantage of producing both?
- Who has higher opportunity cost of making T-shirts?
- Who has a comparative advantage in producing hamburgers?
Question 3
Consider two countries (Home and Foreign) that produce goods 1 (with labour and capital) and 2 (with labour and land) according to the production functions listed below (Table 1 and Table 2). Initially, both countries have the same supply of labour (100 units each), capital, and land. The capital stock in Home then grows. This change shifts out both the production curve for good 1 as a function of labour employed (Table 1) and the associated marginal product of labour curve (Table 2). Nothing happens to the production and marginal curves for good 2.
- Show how the increase in the supply of capital for Home affects its production possibility frontier.
- On the same graph, draw the relative supply curve for both the Home and the Foreign economy.
- If those two economies open up to trade, what will be the pattern of trade (i.e., which country exports which good)?
- Describe how opening up to trade affects all free factors (labour, capital, land) in both countries.
Table 1 | |||||
Labour input to good 1 |
Output of good 1 |
Labour input to Good 2 |
Output of good 2 | ||
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 | ||
10 |
25.1 |
10 |
39.8 | ||
20 |
38.1 |
20 |
52.5 | ||
30 |
48.6 |
30 |
61.8 | ||
40 |
57.7 |
40 |
69.3 | ||
50 |
66 |
50 |
75.8 | ||
60 |
73.6 |
60 |
81.5 | ||
70 |
87 |
70 |
86.7 | ||
80 |
87.4 |
80 |
91.4 | ||
90 |
93.9 |
90 |
95.9 | ||
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 | ||
Table 2 | |||||
Workers Employed |
MPL in sector 1 |
MPL in sector 2 | |||
10 |
1.51 |
1.59 | |||
20 |
1.14 |
1.05 | |||
30 |
1 |
0.82 | |||
40 |
0.87 |
0.69 | |||
50 |
0.78 |
.6 | |||
60 |
0.74 |
0.54 | |||
70 |
0.69 |
0.5 | |||
80 |
0.66 |
0.46 | |||
90 |
0.63 |
0.43 | |||
100 |
0.6 |
0.4 |
Question 4
Answer the following 5 Multiple Choice Questions
- A country does NOT engage in trade can benefit from trade only if
- It employs a unique technology
- Its wage rate is below the world average
- It has an absolute advantage in at least one good
- Pre-trade and free-trade relative prices are identical
- Pre-trade and free-trade relative prices are not identical
- fewer, lower, mobile
- more, higher, mobile
- more, lower, immobile
- fewer, lower, immobile
- more, higher, immobile
- Imports are only restricted when foreign made goods do not meet domestic standard of quality
- Import restrictions are the results of trade wars between hostile countries
- Trade can have substantial effects on a country’s distribution of income
- The Ricardian model is often incorrect in its prediction that trade can be mutually beneficial
- Restriction on Imports are intended to benefit domestic consumers.
- a curved line, constant marginal returns
- a curved line, a limited supply of labour
- a curved line, diminishing marginal returns
- a straight line, constant marginal returns
- a straight line, diminishing marginal returns
- is insignificant in the short run
- is positive for all segments of an economy
- can be significant in the short run
- implies that there are no real gains from trade
- refutes the model of comparative advantage
Answers:
Question 1
Lack of resources is a basic problem and faced by every economy. This kind of problem is faced by countries because wants are limitless, and thus to overcome this problem of scarcity, countries must take decisions regarding choices. Here comes the powerful economic concept which is Opportunity cost. Opportunity cost thus defined as amount of value of any commodity forgone in order to get value of another commodity (Jablonski, Schmit and Kay, 2016).
Now considering two countries and two commodities model i.e., 2 *2 model the concept of opportunity cost can be explained. Let the two countries be India and Thailand and the two commodities are rice and cloth. Both countries are self sufficient and can produce both commodities. But specializing in the commodity for which they have comparative advantage and then trading that commodity allows both economies to consume more. Below table 1 shows how much units of rice and cloth produced by each country.
Countries |
Rice (kg) |
Cloth (meter) |
India |
10 |
5 |
Thailand |
5 |
2 |
Table1: Production figure
Diagram 2 PPC of Thailand
The above diagram 1 and diagram 2 shows PPC of Thailand and India, presently countries are producing rice and cloth using a specific bundle.
Now for showing the opportunity cost of rice and cloth by India and Thailand below table is considered.
Countries |
Opportunity cost of 1kg of rice |
Opportunity cost of 1 meter of cloth |
India |
0.5 |
2 |
Thailand |
0.4 |
2.5 |
Table 2: Opportunity cost
The above table shows opportunity cost incurred by India for producing 1 kg of rice is 0.5 and that of Thailand is 0.4. With respect to cloth, opportunity cost of producing 1 meter of cloth is 2 and 2.5 by India and Thailand respectively. Here it is thus observed that Thailand has low opportunity cost of producing rice compared to cloth. Thus Thailand will produce more rice and will export rice in order to gain from international trade. On the other hand India will specialize in producing cloth and will export cloth. Hence, it can be observed that country that has low opportunity cost of producing a commodity then that country will specialize in producing that commodity (Kurzban et al.2013). This is the reason why Thailand will be producing less cloth for producing more of rice and this is due to the fact rice will provide more economical benefit to country.
Question 2
|
Hamburgers |
T-shirt |
Mike |
10 |
3 |
Johnson |
7 |
4 |
Table 1: Production figure
Considering the above table it is observed that Mike if produce 10 hamburgers then Johnson will produce 7 hamburgers while with respect to T-shirt, Mike produces 3 T-shirts and Johnson produces 4 T-shirts.
Diagram 1 Production Possibility Curve (PPC)
The above diagram shows production possibility curve CD. A and B are two commodity bundles. Mike and Johnson can attain either bundle. Mike if attain bundle A then more hamburgers are produced and less shirt is produced and Johnson if attain bundle B he will produce more of shirts less of T-shirts. However, it is clear that although low T-shirts are produced less but selling T-shirts is more profitable than hamburgers.
|
Hamburgers |
T-shirt |
Mike |
10 |
3 |
Johnson |
7 |
4 |
Table 1:Production figure
According to table 1, Mike produces 10 hamburgers using 24 hours or can produce 3 T-shirts using same hours of labor. On the other hand Johnson produces 7 hamburgers and 4 T-shirts a day. From the point of view of absolute advantage theory, Mike has absolute advantage in producing hamburgers while Johnson has absolute advantage in producing T-shirts. But the absolute advantage enjoyed by Johnson is less than Mike so Mike will enjoy absolute advantage in producing both the goods.
|
Opportunity cost of 1 hamburger |
Opportunity cost of 1 T-shirt |
Mike |
0.3 |
3.3 |
Johnson |
0.5 |
1.75 |
Table 2: Opportunity cost
The above table shows that Mike incurs high opportunity cost while making T-shirts. The reason behind this – Johnson can produce T-shirts at a low opportunity cost and Mike can produce hamburger at a low opportunity cost. Hence, Johnson will produce more of T-shirts and Mike should produce more of hamburgers.
|
Opportunity cost of 1 hamburger |
Opportunity cost of 1 T-shirt |
Mike |
0.3 |
3.3 |
Johnson |
0.5 |
1.75 |
Table 2: Opportunity cost
The above table shows that Mike has comparative advantage in producing hamburgers. The reason behind this is, producing hamburger incurs low opportunity cost to Mike than producing T-shirts which incurs high opportunity cost. Hence in order to benefit from trading, Mike will produce hamburgers in order to reap benefits from trade.
Question 3
Production Function of good 1 Q1=Q1 (K1, L1)
Here Q1 refers to economy’s output of good 1, K1 is economy’s capital stock and L1 is the labor force employed in good 1.
Production Function of good 2 Q2=Q2 (K2, L2)
Here Q2 refers to economy’s output of good 2, K2 is economy’s capital stock and L2 is the labor force employed in good 2.
The condition for full employment requires the supply of labor employed in good 1 plus supply of labor employed in good 2
L1+ L2=L
Initially both countries have same supply of labor, capital and land. Now if capital stock of home country increases then it impacts PPF. Due to lack of land, home will produce a high ratio of good 1 to good 2 at any given prices.
Diagram 1: Changing capital stock
Diagram 1 shows relative supply curve is P2XMPL2 and relative demand curves are P1XMP1L1 and P1XMP1L12 , W1 and W 2 are wage rates . Now increase in capital supply shifts supply curve to outward and increase in supply of labor shifts supply curve to inward. Thus home has more capital per worker than foreign on the other hand foreign has more land per worker. Thus in autarky situation relative price of good 1 in home country is lower than the relative price in foreign in autarky situation. Thus trade leads to convergence of relative price.
Diagram 1: Changing capital stock
Diagram 1 shows relative supply curve is P2XMPL2 and relative demand curves are P1XMP1L1 and P1XMP1L12 , W1 and W 2 are wage rates . Now increase in capital supply shifts supply curve to outward and increase in supply of labor shifts supply curve to inward. Thus home has more capital per worker than foreign on the other hand foreign has more land per worker. Thus in autarky situation relative price of good 1 in home country is lower than the relative price in foreign in autarky situation. Thus trade leads to convergence of relative price.
Diagram 2: Pattern of trade
The above diagram shows that country that cannot participate in trade then the output of that country equals its consumption. Now if the country involves itself in trade then, international trade makes it possible to consume the goods which the country doesn’t even produce, thus the mix of two goods can be consumed. Opening up to trade shifts relative prices of good 1 and good 2. Thus pattern of trade shows that home will export good 1 and foreign will export good 2. This pattern is followed because capital stock increases in home and good 1 uses capital and labor and good 2 uses labor and land.
Question 4
- A country does not engage in trade can benefit from trade only if-Pre-trade and
Free-trade relative prices are not identical.
- The effect of trade on specialized employees of exporting industries will be more jobs and higher pay because they are relatively immobile.
- The Ricardian model of international trade demonstrates that trade can be mutually beneficial. Why, then, do governments restrict imports of some goods?
Answer-Trade can have substantial effects on a country’s distribution of income
- In the specific factor model, a country’s production function is a curved line because of diminishing marginal returns.
- The effect of trade on income distribution can be significant in the short run
References
Benhabib, J. and Nishimura, K., 2012. Competitive equilibrium cycles. In Nonlinear Dynamics in Equilibrium Models (pp. 75-96). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
Jablonski, B.B.R., Schmit, T.M. and Kay, D., 2016. Assessing the economic impacts of food hubs on regional economies: A framework that includes opportunity cost. Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, 45(1), pp.143-172.
Kurzban, R., Duckworth, A., Kable, J.W. and Myers, J., 2013. An opportunity cost model of subjective effort and task performance. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 36(6), pp.661-679.
Laursen, K., 2015. Revealed comparative advantage and the alternatives as measures of international specialization. Eurasian Business Review, 5(1), pp.99-115.
Ruijs, A., Wossink, A., Kortelainen, M., Alkemade, R. and Schulp, C.J.E., 2013. Trade-off analysis of ecosystem services in Eastern Europe. Ecosystem services, 4, pp.82-94.
Schumacher, R., 2012. Adam Smith's theory of absolute advantage and the use of doxography in the history of economics. Erasmus Journal for Philosophy and Economics, 5(2), pp.54-80.
Buy Eco3Itr International Trade And The Assessment Answers Online
Talk to our expert to get the help with Eco3Itr International Trade And The Assessment Answers to complete your assessment on time and boost your grades now
The main aim/motive of the management assignment help services is to get connect with a greater number of students, and effectively help, and support them in getting completing their assignments the students also get find this a wonderful opportunity where they could effectively learn more about their topics, as the experts also have the best team members with them in which all the members effectively support each other to get complete their diploma assignments. They complete the assessments of the students in an appropriate manner and deliver them back to the students before the due date of the assignment so that the students could timely submit this, and can score higher marks. The experts of the assignment help services at urgenthomework.com are so much skilled, capable, talented, and experienced in their field of programming homework help writing assignments, so, for this, they can effectively write the best economics assignment help services.