Bulaw5911- Australian Wheat Board Assessment Answer

BULAW5911- Australian Wheat Board - Managing the Legal Environment - Oxford - Case Study - Law Assessment Answer 

Assessment Task::

The case is included in (2012) Contemporary Challenges in Corporate Governance, Wells, P. and Mueller, J. (eds) RossiSmith, Oxford, pp 89-100. Although the case is not solely on the matter of managing legal risk, significant aspects of it involve just that. It demonstrates the links and interrelationships between legal risk and other aspects of risk that may impact a company or other organization.

Introduction:

The Australian Wheat Board (AWB) first came to public attention and later scrutiny by the Coles Commission as a result of allegations (consequently proven in court) that it paid bribes to the Iraqi government via inflated fees to Alia, a Jordanian trucking company. The purpose of the bribes was to protect its lucrative UN wheat supply contracts under the food-for-oil agreement (a negotiated exception to the international trade embargo imposed on Iraq after its development of weapons of mass destruction (WMD). Although the scandal erupted more than 12 years ago, it still serves as a clear reminder of how weak governance, poor decision making, misaligned priorities and rampant greed can have widely felt ramifications not only for the organization itself but a broad range of stakeholders. This can also be the case where organizations fail to manage activity at the interface with communities, investors, markets (product, capital, and employment) and opinion leaders.

Questions to consider (rather than the discussion questions at the end of the case study):
1. Why do you think AWB was able to pursue the behaviour that led to the scandal?
2. Why did the AWB scandal attract so much attention both nationally and internationally?
3. Who was affected by the scandal and the final outcome?
4. Why are the answers to 1 and 2 important in terms of legal risk management? Why and how?
5. How important is organisational reputation to sustainability of the organisation? Why?
6. Do you think the AWB should have admitted wrongdoing early or was it better to deny?
Why? What else (or alternative thing) should it have done?
7. Who lost the most? Do you think that reasonable as a reflection of culpability? What does that suggest in terms of the focus of legal risk management?

This Law assessment has been solved by our Law experts at Assignment Help Experts. Our Assignment Writing Experts are efficient to provide a fresh solution to this question. We are serving more than 10000+ Students in Australia, UK & US by helping them to score HD in their academics. Our Experts are well trained to follow all marking rubrics & referencing style.

Be it a used or new solution, the quality of the work submitted by our assignment experts remains unhampered. You may continue to expect the same or even better quality with the used and new assignment solution files respectively. There’s one thing to be noticed that you could choose one between the two and acquire an HD either way. You could choose a new assignment solution file to get yourself an exclusive, plagiarism (with free Turnitin file), expert quality assignment or order an old solution file that was considered worthy of the highest distinction